The guy consistently spamming rules in /s/ really deserves a perma ban. It was fine the first few times, but now he's doing it just to be an ass. He hasn't shared anything because he says "It's too good to be posted", yet he's bitching that there is no quality in /s/. Please... someone get rid of him for fuck's sake.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:04 ID:bGt+pKAa
/s/ is in a shit state because no one if following the rules. /s/ is not /b/ so STFU.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:06 ID:1GTiQHxE
Yes, but arguing about it has solved nothing. All you do is complain about how bad everything is, get everyone into a debate about how much of a faggot you are, and nobody posts anything.
If anyone should find a different website, it's you. You're the only one complaining about how bad /s/ is. So fucking leave, you twit.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:09 ID:bGt+pKAa
nobody posts anything? All that was being posted was shit before and during. If you can't follow the fucking rules YOU should leave. You are the cancer. The cancer is removed.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:13 ID:1GTiQHxE
You've never shit up any of my threads, for which I'm thankful. But you're persistence throughout the rest of the board has been nothing but you proving to be an annoying troll.
Re-read the rules and follow your own advice. Trolling is an offense in /s/, and that's all you're doing by not sharing your own material.
If I don't see anything worth saving in a thread, I don't piss and moan like an immature child. I move on and find something else. It's not that difficult.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:18 ID:pvZGcYSe
I've seen people perma-banned for less. I believe this constitutes as "Threadshitting".
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:18 ID:bGt+pKAa
I'm not trolling /s/ since /s/ does not exist. People think it is /b/ and /r/.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:21 ID:1GTiQHxE
So let me try to understand what you just said.
You act like everyone treats /s/ as if it were /b/. Therefore, they don't listen to the rules and post crap.
You come in as if you were some hero, simply trolling threads at random, because you want the content of /s/ to be better. But you're breaking those very same rules that you are spamming. To make the boards better?
Now you're saying that rules don't pertain to you. Seriously, just quit.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:24 ID:bGt+pKAa
I didn't start this thread whining about not being able to post transexual Suicide Girls. Rules don't pertain to an /s/ that has been turned into a subsidiary of /b/. Do you see?
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:27 ID:1GTiQHxE
I never said anything about Suicide Girls. I personally think they are disgusting, but I don't get all angry and bothered when someone posts them on /s/. It's their taste, and you should respect that instead of being an ass about it.
Nowhere in the rules does it say you cannot post Suicide Girls. It may not be your idea of quality, but people were never banned for posting it before.
Start your own thread in /s/ and make an improvement.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:28 ID:pvZGcYSe
He's not going to start his own thread though, isn't it obvious?
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:31 ID:bGt+pKAa
SG WAS bannable before. And the hardcore shit was only tolerate because there was few posts. Now /s/ is FULL of porn videos and /r/ and other garbage so that any quality thread is bumped into deletion.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:34 ID:pvZGcYSe
>SG WAS bannable before.
Since when?
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:34 ID:1GTiQHxE
No, it isn't. When garbage is posted, leave it alone and it will be deleted over time. The quality threads remain if you keep submitting and sharing.
You're constant arguing has done absolutely nothing to change how the boards are kept. If anything, you've made the place worse. You should take your complaints to a mod rather than just shit in every thread.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:45 ID:Mjglb614
SG was bannable, but only because so many people posted it.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:54 ID:bGt+pKAa
And now SG is spammed all day.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:54 ID:pvZGcYSe
"SG was bannable, but only because so many people posted it."
That doesn't even make sense. People posting /s/ relevant content in /s/, so they were banned for it?
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:56 ID:/zUHJBqR
whats going on
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:58 ID:1GTiQHxE
That was a long time ago. At least two years ago.
Since then, 4chan's popularity sky rocketed and new rules applied. I don't agree with the fact that /s/ isn't moderated enough, but trolling an SG thread simply for the sake of creating chaos, is a bannable offense.
He should be reporting, not back seat modding.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 21:59 ID:bGt+pKAa
"That doesn't even make sense. People posting /s/ relevant content in /s/, so they were banned for it?"
Hence the rules for /s/. SG are not Sexy Beautiful Women by any stretch of the imagination. Subjectivity need not apply.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 22:01 ID:fBgr87rv
"That doesn't even make sense. People posting /s/ relevant content in /s/, so they were banned for it?"
As anon said, this was awhile ago. Also, it was a ridiculous amount of SG's. Like, ridiculous.
Personally, I'm just fine with them as they are now.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 22:03 ID:1GTiQHxE
They're much more accepted since SG started getting *somewhat* more attractive models (example: Ember, Quinne).
You think other people are breaking the rules when the posts don't meet your standards. Thus, you shit all over the thread, stirring a hornet's nest, act like an internet bully for 30 minutes and move on. 4chan doesn't need that kind of cancer.
You're arguing about PORN for fuck's sake. Get over yourself.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 22:03 ID:pvZGcYSe
"SG are not Sexy Beautiful Women by any stretch of the imagination."
Ok, so now you're just trolling. Is anyone going to ban this idiot yet or what?
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 22:12 ID:pvZGcYSe
Reporting does nothing.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 22:25 ID:xo1+K9kZ
we all know what is sexy and what isn't in a general sense. arguing over that is completely stupid. SG is beautiful to someone while it's trash to another...but saging, and bitching about it just proves you need to grow up. if you don't like the girls from SG ignore that specific thread and move on. stop being a jackass.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 22:38 ID:Alh86SDz
"When garbage is posted, leave it alone and it will be deleted over time. The quality threads remain if you keep submitting and sharing."
And then these threads get 20 bump/moar replies and shit all over the ones where people actually try to submit content. Did you see how fast the Anya thread got covered just a short while ago?
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 22:42 ID:pvZGcYSe
"And then these threads get 20 bump/moar replies and shit all over the ones where people actually try to submit content. Did you see how fast the Anya thread got covered just a short while ago?"
And spamming rules really stops this.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 22:45 ID:xo1+K9kZ
that's a different story. that has nothing to do with taste or content but the ignorance of those who can't stop bumping...though the spam from those who sage and post rules is far worse. just because your thread doesn't reach top doesn't meant you have the right to be a dick and sage other threads.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 22:53 ID:Alh86SDz
The fact of the matter is, that 4chan has been lacking in moderation. The sage spam doesn't fix anything, but neither does "just let it happen." So what are we to do? Alert a mod who may or may not even exist? Nothing works.
Name:
Anonymous2007-08-09 22:58 ID:xo1+K9kZ
I've gotten pretty used to just ignoring it. Let them waste their time doing such silly things. Arguing them or making any comments towards them is also fruitless. These people will always be around since they can proxy. Not much we can do against it even with mods. Shutting down a board for a small amount of time only allows that spammer to win and encourage him to spend more of his already pathetic life doing so. This is why logins are created. The downfall of anonymous is the spam plague of halfwit losers. We'll have to deal with it to stay as anon.