>>6
(I lol'd)
I don't like Trevorchan mostly because:
1. It doesn't Gazou or Futaba in the footer, like it should.
2. It comes with a thread watcher (yeah it can be enabled in the config.php) - why have one in the first place, when that's what firefox addon programmers are for.
3. Its structure is such so that if I wanted to hack it, I'd have to read every file, whereas on wakaba/kareha/futallaby, I can just look at basically less than a few files (futallaby is one file) and figure out what I need to change and do it.
4. With futallaby, I can make sure that all my mods are fine by just running imgboard.php on the individual boards, I don't want to have to login to some admin panel with homo gifs running around and rebuild all the boards, just because if I change one board, I change them all (as per the script).
5. It comes with a favicon that looks lame, and half of the people that use the script don't know how to rm favicon.ico.
6. It uses OO. Why use OO on something like this when it is way easier to just not.
Those are just simple reasons that someone can get over, the biggest problem that I have with it, however, is the fact that it gives you, essentially, a 4chan in a box (or a .zip/.tar.gz). It hinders exploration and creativity among the *chan community, which is lame to begin with, but by giving them everything they ask for, and don't need, it only furthers that fact.