>>11 While it's basically the only way to go, it's just as stupid as the idea of a requesting board to make a rapidshare board.
I take it you mean that a rapidshare-board would be just as useless as /r/ is now. And you'd be better off having people requesting content in content specific boards rather than in a request-specific board.
But then suddenly boards that -were- used for discussion quickly turn into crapholes. This has been proven countless times on forums and other BSS long before 4chan.
Also; the uselessness of 4chan's /r/ is unique to 4chan. Because of the massive userbase, /r/ moves too quickly for people to respond. On other 4chan clones posts tend to stay around for quite a while. After time these actually -do- get responses, making the board much more successful. /r/ is simply not a discussion board.
>>11 just because a bunch of elitist "vets" get irritated [that] people don't automatically know as much as they do, doesn't warrant the abandonment of certain practices.
Who's abandoning what practices?
Anyway; I think creating a filesharing board is just a workaround to whatever reason we need one. You -can- post rapidshares in /t/, just don't make threads about them. But that has obvious problems.
Often torrents are ungainly. So why not allow filesharing links aswell? Suddenly the place is flooded with them.
And yes; you -could- make a filesharing board, but that leaves /r/ even MORE useless.
Not that it matters. Who's going to pay attention to this thread? It's clear none of the 4chan fatcats give two (or more) shits about the textboards (or the layout would be back to how it was [BETTER]). And if they did, I doubt they'd care much over such a trivial matter.