Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Minecraft sucks

Name: Anonymous 2010-09-11 23:55

I got Minecraft (Alpha) yesterday. I played for a few hours. I made a castle, a dungeon, and a house. I realized that's pretty much what the entire game was. It's like Legos, but slower and you can kill stuff. If you're thinking about getting it, the free version is almost exactly the same. The weapons/enemies don't really add anything to the game. Don't waste 9.95 Euros on it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-09-23 19:03

>>753
No, everything isn't a "challenge" unless you're particularly "CHALLENGED". Getting up in the morning isn't a particular challenge for normal people (and it certainly isn't a game either because it isn't even enjoyable, making it at most a tedious task).

...and challenged people can be challenged all they want, but when Cursed stepped in, and banned everyone who WASN'T mentally challenged, and forced Notch to adapt to a new RETARD fanbase, then normal people are going to get pissed off about the REVERSED racism, especially since it was done in such a horrendous manner. (Banning people for "being rapists" without appeal, et.c..)

When building Lego, you have to pay attention to gravity, to finding pieces, and to make sure that you have enough pieces. Minecraft is easier than Lego. The only challenge in Minecraft is overcoming its ugliness, by making the creations so big that you can't see the blocks anymore. It's still just "getting creative", not "playing a game".

I'm not talking about redstone not being realistic. I'm talking about it not having a place in Minecraft. In fact, it's the very OPPOSITE of Minecraft, which is why most of the community started raging against it.

Newer Posts