anyone played the demo? ideas? thoughts? first impressions?
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-17 19:21 ID:agkwdFBd
i like it... it is innovative in certain ways(like being able to disguise yourself as a dead enemy), but i think it could have been much improved.
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-18 12:59 ID:IM73Jodo
It doesn't feel as solid as Battlefield 2. Yeah, one's "realistic" and one is arcade, but still, tanks shouldn't drive up walls and feel like plastic.
The ability to deploy artillery and similar things is nice, but you can't map the joystick to controls without messing with .cfg files yet.
I might buy it in 6 months.
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-19 20:48 ID:7Sor5LRc
to be honest, i see alot of improvment from the previous quakes, they actaully made it seem like a war rather than pointlessly fighting in random space places. but they down sized the graphics alot if u ask me. Gonna get it, but i wouldn't really think of pre-ordering it so soon, play the open beta, then decide to pre-order it.
Name:
Anonymous 2007-09-19 22:02 ID:+gFZGhXH
WORST GAME EVER evvvverrrrr
Name:
Anonymous 2007-09-19 22:03 ID:+gFZGhXH
this game had the worst demo ever
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-19 22:03 ID:Po/swJfL
ET:QW is the phail
PHAIL
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-20 16:14 ID:i+xoXUvw
needs alotta updatin, played the demo. used to be a huge quake fan
but as 3 said, things just don't feel right atm
fast gameplay tho depends on your taste i guess
you're all niggers
though it might not be the same as bf2 at least both sides are mirror images of one another...another funny thing is that the demo is more stable in the first week than BF2 after 7 patches
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-23 21:00 ID:Dz6A4HeD
Why does nobody know this is a remake of Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory
Name:
Anonymous2007-09-23 22:45 ID:uZG38fJX
I do since it is made by splash damage the same company/modding group that invented Enemy Territory. thought it went without saying