>>117
Dude, that wasn't a point argument. That is what is called a counter-rebuttal. What does that mean? Well, why don't I educate you!
When an argument/dicussion occurs, it can go in one of several directions. If it is on the internet, it will invariably fall in one direction: Childishness. The replies 116 gave are to people who provided no case towards the argument at hand, but rather to simple-minded (childish) rebuttals. Once replies to the argument fall into this category, one must always reply in kind, for it is the understanding of all parties involved that the "side being replied to" only understands that base-level of rebutting. Or, rather, that the "other side" is no longer able to continue a reasonably-minded and intellectual argument.
Therefore, again, all replies are written in such a way that it is understood the "other side of the argument" is able to comprehend.
tl;dr version: If
>>110, >>111, &
>>115 (if not the same person) wishes to continue the argument/discussion on an intellectual level, and is prepared to provide proof of their outlandish claims, then "Bring it". Otherwise, they may fade away, comforted in the knowledge that the American RPG user is seen as being of simple mind.