>>4
Mobile phones, PDAs and gaming consoles. These devices number in the millions. If they were to become connected to the net, you'd want to have a direct IP address and not a NAT hack.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-01 21:01
>>6 you'd want to have a direct IP address
Why? So I can run a web service on my fridge?
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-01 21:52
Way to comprehend. I said nothing about fridges.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-02 5:45
I don't want to run web services on my mobile phone or PDA either. I'd happily NAT those.
>>4
Indians are becoming more affluent. Over time, there will be a greater demand for Internet access and associated IP address allocations for Indian Internet. Don't forget that India has the world's second most populous country. I would say that we would need IPv6 because of China alone but that has its own censored Internet.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-02 8:59
>>12
Why don't you Amerikkkan faggots just quit hogging most of the IP address range for yourself? That would already help a lot.
>>10
IPv6 has had years to advance. No one gives a shit and no one really needs it.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-02 12:44
>>13
I give a ``shit,'' and I could list numerous things that I could do with IPv6 that I couldn't do with IPv4.
Right now I have worked my life in the way that it works with IPv4, but the number of workarounds and hacks are just too much.