>>8
A 2
33-bit number contains no redundancies that would allow it to be compressed. You need to have a better sense of information theory.
>>11
OK, but the exponent is at a maximum for the base assumption, and any reduction of that exponent to create the base can't exceed
2
233. The point is, 2
33 bits contains
a maximum of information content as already expressed by 2
233, unless EXTERNAL assumptions are applied ... like any base that you'd
arbitrarily choose and that is represented outside that gigabyte. You could say that the entire gigabyte is the exponent
x for the function 39328
[sup]x
[sup].