Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

help me pick a flavor of linux

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 17:10

I recently obtained a win98 laptop and feel like using it to play around with Linux. I need something rather light on resouces and with a good support community for if/when I need help. What do you suggest?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 18:00

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 18:08

ignore >>2 and >>4-
http://www.kubuntu.org/ is what you want

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 18:09


........
..
.......................
.......
.........
..
.
.
..

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 18:11

www.debian.org is not what you want, but what you need

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 19:01

>>3
die
>>5
you forgot he is a newbie

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 19:10

ubuntu or xubuntu (http://www.xubuntu.org, if you want something that is lighter on resources)

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 19:13

>>3
is an idiot. {x,k}ubuntu is going to run like SHIT. try pclinuxOS.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 0:10

he said  LIGHT  on resourcess.  That means Slackware.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 0:18

Seriously, there are so many distros, even if you want to check out Linux as a newbie, you won't because you can't decide between them and evaluate all of them. Shit sucks.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 0:50

Ubuntu is probably the easiest choice for a new linux user.  I use Ubuntu on my windows 98 laptop, and it runs just fine.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 1:10

your choice of window manager is probably more significant than your choice of linux distro for resource use.  Gnome and KDE are the bloatiest options, if you're worried about limited resources try something like FVWM or Blackbox instead.

http://xwinman.org/ for other options

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 1:23

>>1
if you can't decide what to use without someone telling you, you shouldn't be using a computer

the cotton fields are where you belong

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 1:51

>>1

I have an IBM thinkpad T22, and Ubuntu works well on it. Though I did give it a bit of help by turning off useless services (like bluetooth crap, cron, blah blah etc).

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 2:00

oh yeah, thats right, if you've been using windows ubuntu will seem to run fine.

slow 386 compiled software is slooooooow

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 2:11

slow 386 compiled software is slooooooow
wut?

VROOOM VROOOM

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 2:15

>>16
actually, the difference between 386 and 686 is very noticable. yeah, a little bit of  vroom vroom  going on. but it was mainly a joke.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 3:38

LINUX IS FOR 14 YEAR OLD VIRGIN SCRIPT KIDDIES.

BSD MOTHERFUCKER.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 3:46

>>18
even though i like linux, that made me lol.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 9:16

>>6
you forgot he is a newbie

that's exactly why he needs debian.
after that, he's no newb anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 9:18

>>18
BSD IS FOR 60 YEAR OLD UNIX-HACKERS WHO HATE GUIs.

AMIGA OS MOTHERFUCKER.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 12:03

>>21
wow. amigafags still exist? Even though amiga OS is 2 years late and will probably NEVER come out?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 12:25

>>22
No, but trolls and facetious comments do.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 12:40

Gentoo

Ubuntu will be slow as hell if you don't have at least a Pentium 3 with 256 MB RAM

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 15:23

>>24

Gentoo is much faster because it is OPTIMISED for YOUR HARDWARE, because you compile it yourself.

Gentoo is like a high performance racing car. It needs a good deal of tuning.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 15:46

>>22
AmigaOS 6 was released one or two weeks ago

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 15:49

>>25
The only difference is: the high performance racing car is much faster than the normal thing. Self-compiled programs are around 0.001 % faster than a precompiled one.
Have fun with your Placebo.

But if you need it: You can completely compile your system with any other distro, too. Even with FreeBSD which isn't even a Linux.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 16:23

>>27
RESPONDING TO COPYPASTA IS SRS BUISINESS

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 17:12

>>1
Pussy juice-flavoured

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 18:00

OP here
http://linux.toshiba-dme.co.jp/linux/eng/spec.php3?model=490CDT This is what I have, but mine has 64MB of ram.

I don't mind a trial by fire, but Debian looks like it's a little too far over my head.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 18:22

damn small linux.

its not the EASIEST but it is easy and it is quick.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 18:23

When you linux users go to purchase a car, do you want to learn locksmithing so you can make a key to get into the door, make another for the ignition, learn electronics so you can install fresh turn signals, and replace the fucking engine with batteries before you start the damn thing? Or do you just want to give it a test drive before you invest your time in something that wont meet your needs?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 20:19

xubuntu

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 20:24

the *ubuntu family is good for newbies, and has a great community.   of these xubuntu is the lightest in terms of resource use.  if it isn't light enough to work in comfortably, it's easy to install alternate desktop environments later.  (see>>12)

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 20:24

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 21:24

xubuntu is by no means the lightest of the ubuntu family. May I introduce you to nubuntu http://www.nubuntu.org/

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-11 8:58

>>32
Except the car costs lots of money and linux is free.
YOUR LOGIC IS RETARDED!

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-11 9:59

Anyways, >>1->>37 please listen to me. Not that it's really related to this thread. I went to check out Ubuntu a while ago; you know, Ubuntu? Well anyways there was an insane number of people downloading it, and I couldn't get past the front page. Then, I looked at the banner posted at the top of the page, and it had "KDE" written on it. Oh, the stupidity. Those idiots. You, don't come to Linux just for because it has KDE, fool. It's only KDE, the K-DESKTOP ENVIRONMENT for crying out loud. There're even entire families here. Family of 4, all installing some Ubuntu, huh? How fucking nice. "Alright, daddy's gonna run Konqueror!" God I can't bear to watch. You people, I'll give you XGL and Compiz/Beryl if you get out of this community. Linux should be a bloody place. That tense atmosphere, where two niggers on opposite sides of the street can start a fight at any time, The stab-or-be-stabbed mentality, that's what's great about Coonix. Women and children should screw off and stay home. Anyways, I was about to start initializing my raid array, and then the bastard beside me goes "Install Updates with Synaptic Package Manager." Who in the world uses the synaptic package manager, you moron? I want to ask him, "do you REALLY want to have everything installed FOR you?" I want to interrogate him. I want to interrogate him for roughly an hour. Are you sure you don't just want to try saying "install updates"? Coming from a Debian veteran such as myself, the latest trend among us vets is this, apt-get dist-upgrade. That's right, apt-get dist-upgraade. This is the vet's way of managing packages. Apt-get dist-upgrade means more freedom than hand-holding. But on the other hand the risk of breaking existing configuration files is a tad higher. This is the key. And then, it's delicious. This is unbeatable. However, if you do this this then there is danger that you'll be marked by the package maintainers from next time on; it's a double-edged sword. I can't recommend it to amateurs. What this all really means, though, is that you, >>1->>37, should just stick with today's special.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-11 10:58

>>38
This is a good Yosinoya variant. Definetely saved.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-11 11:42

Lold

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List