Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

help me pick a flavor of linux

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 17:10

I recently obtained a win98 laptop and feel like using it to play around with Linux. I need something rather light on resouces and with a good support community for if/when I need help. What do you suggest?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 18:00

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 18:08

ignore >>2 and >>4-
http://www.kubuntu.org/ is what you want

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 18:09


........
..
.......................
.......
.........
..
.
.
..

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 18:11

www.debian.org is not what you want, but what you need

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 19:01

>>3
die
>>5
you forgot he is a newbie

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 19:10

ubuntu or xubuntu (http://www.xubuntu.org, if you want something that is lighter on resources)

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-09 19:13

>>3
is an idiot. {x,k}ubuntu is going to run like SHIT. try pclinuxOS.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 0:10

he said  LIGHT  on resourcess.  That means Slackware.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 0:18

Seriously, there are so many distros, even if you want to check out Linux as a newbie, you won't because you can't decide between them and evaluate all of them. Shit sucks.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 0:50

Ubuntu is probably the easiest choice for a new linux user.  I use Ubuntu on my windows 98 laptop, and it runs just fine.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 1:10

your choice of window manager is probably more significant than your choice of linux distro for resource use.  Gnome and KDE are the bloatiest options, if you're worried about limited resources try something like FVWM or Blackbox instead.

http://xwinman.org/ for other options

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 1:23

>>1
if you can't decide what to use without someone telling you, you shouldn't be using a computer

the cotton fields are where you belong

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 1:51

>>1

I have an IBM thinkpad T22, and Ubuntu works well on it. Though I did give it a bit of help by turning off useless services (like bluetooth crap, cron, blah blah etc).

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 2:00

oh yeah, thats right, if you've been using windows ubuntu will seem to run fine.

slow 386 compiled software is slooooooow

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 2:11

slow 386 compiled software is slooooooow
wut?

VROOOM VROOOM

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 2:15

>>16
actually, the difference between 386 and 686 is very noticable. yeah, a little bit of  vroom vroom  going on. but it was mainly a joke.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 3:38

LINUX IS FOR 14 YEAR OLD VIRGIN SCRIPT KIDDIES.

BSD MOTHERFUCKER.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 3:46

>>18
even though i like linux, that made me lol.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 9:16

>>6
you forgot he is a newbie

that's exactly why he needs debian.
after that, he's no newb anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 9:18

>>18
BSD IS FOR 60 YEAR OLD UNIX-HACKERS WHO HATE GUIs.

AMIGA OS MOTHERFUCKER.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 12:03

>>21
wow. amigafags still exist? Even though amiga OS is 2 years late and will probably NEVER come out?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 12:25

>>22
No, but trolls and facetious comments do.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 12:40

Gentoo

Ubuntu will be slow as hell if you don't have at least a Pentium 3 with 256 MB RAM

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 15:23

>>24

Gentoo is much faster because it is OPTIMISED for YOUR HARDWARE, because you compile it yourself.

Gentoo is like a high performance racing car. It needs a good deal of tuning.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 15:46

>>22
AmigaOS 6 was released one or two weeks ago

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 15:49

>>25
The only difference is: the high performance racing car is much faster than the normal thing. Self-compiled programs are around 0.001 % faster than a precompiled one.
Have fun with your Placebo.

But if you need it: You can completely compile your system with any other distro, too. Even with FreeBSD which isn't even a Linux.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 16:23

>>27
RESPONDING TO COPYPASTA IS SRS BUISINESS

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 17:12

>>1
Pussy juice-flavoured

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 18:00

OP here
http://linux.toshiba-dme.co.jp/linux/eng/spec.php3?model=490CDT This is what I have, but mine has 64MB of ram.

I don't mind a trial by fire, but Debian looks like it's a little too far over my head.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 18:22

damn small linux.

its not the EASIEST but it is easy and it is quick.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 18:23

When you linux users go to purchase a car, do you want to learn locksmithing so you can make a key to get into the door, make another for the ignition, learn electronics so you can install fresh turn signals, and replace the fucking engine with batteries before you start the damn thing? Or do you just want to give it a test drive before you invest your time in something that wont meet your needs?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 20:19

xubuntu

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 20:24

the *ubuntu family is good for newbies, and has a great community.   of these xubuntu is the lightest in terms of resource use.  if it isn't light enough to work in comfortably, it's easy to install alternate desktop environments later.  (see>>12)

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 20:24

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-10 21:24

xubuntu is by no means the lightest of the ubuntu family. May I introduce you to nubuntu http://www.nubuntu.org/

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-11 8:58

>>32
Except the car costs lots of money and linux is free.
YOUR LOGIC IS RETARDED!

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-11 9:59

Anyways, >>1->>37 please listen to me. Not that it's really related to this thread. I went to check out Ubuntu a while ago; you know, Ubuntu? Well anyways there was an insane number of people downloading it, and I couldn't get past the front page. Then, I looked at the banner posted at the top of the page, and it had "KDE" written on it. Oh, the stupidity. Those idiots. You, don't come to Linux just for because it has KDE, fool. It's only KDE, the K-DESKTOP ENVIRONMENT for crying out loud. There're even entire families here. Family of 4, all installing some Ubuntu, huh? How fucking nice. "Alright, daddy's gonna run Konqueror!" God I can't bear to watch. You people, I'll give you XGL and Compiz/Beryl if you get out of this community. Linux should be a bloody place. That tense atmosphere, where two niggers on opposite sides of the street can start a fight at any time, The stab-or-be-stabbed mentality, that's what's great about Coonix. Women and children should screw off and stay home. Anyways, I was about to start initializing my raid array, and then the bastard beside me goes "Install Updates with Synaptic Package Manager." Who in the world uses the synaptic package manager, you moron? I want to ask him, "do you REALLY want to have everything installed FOR you?" I want to interrogate him. I want to interrogate him for roughly an hour. Are you sure you don't just want to try saying "install updates"? Coming from a Debian veteran such as myself, the latest trend among us vets is this, apt-get dist-upgrade. That's right, apt-get dist-upgraade. This is the vet's way of managing packages. Apt-get dist-upgrade means more freedom than hand-holding. But on the other hand the risk of breaking existing configuration files is a tad higher. This is the key. And then, it's delicious. This is unbeatable. However, if you do this this then there is danger that you'll be marked by the package maintainers from next time on; it's a double-edged sword. I can't recommend it to amateurs. What this all really means, though, is that you, >>1->>37, should just stick with today's special.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-11 10:58

>>38
This is a good Yosinoya variant. Definetely saved.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-11 11:42

Lold

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-11 15:41

>>32
Live cd mother fucker. Do you use it?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-12 6:55

grape?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-12 7:14

>>30

Want to know what I would do with that laptop? I'd do an ubuntu server install; it installs the bare minimum stuff that is required. Then install only what is needed, and turn off unused services. Only then will it run well enough to be usable.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-12 8:44

uh

ubuntu server install?

dude just fucking install Debian on it

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-12 8:50

              ∧_∧   / ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄
              ( ´∀`) < ubuntu is for gay niggers order more delicious 吉野家
            /    |    \
           /       .|      ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄
           / "⌒ヽ |.イ |
       __ |   .ノ | || |__
      .    ノく__つ∪∪   \
       _((_________\
        ̄ ̄ヽつ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ | | ̄

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-12 12:05

>>44
ubuntu server install?
dude just fucking install Debian on it

QFT

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-12 12:32

>>46

Debian is teh fail:
It is never updated (kernel 2.6.8 ?!?!?! HELLO !!!), you have to use their bleeding edge distro just to catch up to last year. Might as well just use Slack and be a man about it.


Name: Anonymous 2007-01-13 15:23

>>47
What do you need a newer kernel for on a server.
LOGIC FAILS AGAIN

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-13 15:35

>>47

Slack is down in the stack.
Gentoo ftw.
Debian is the best, but debian users are fucking integrists/human failures

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-15 12:50

>>49
You're just jealous that you are not as 1337 as they are

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-15 13:39

In during Arch Linux.

http://www.archlinux.org./

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-15 14:33

lets see ummmm SECURITY PATCHES
yeah thats it

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-15 15:39

>>48
bitches dont know 'bout my SECURITY PATCHES.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-15 17:30

>>53
The kernel IS patched on stable servers, fag.
go learn debian.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-15 17:39

>>50
"You're just jealous that you are not as 1337 as they think"
>>Fixed.
Real 1337 use *BSD

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-15 19:47

>>54
Terribly sorry but if I wanted to learn to be a fag I'd just go use a Mac.

Deb is for religious GNU zealots that have more time on their hands than sense in their heads...

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-15 20:11

KUBUNTU MOTHERFUCKERS

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-15 21:56

ehr, debian is not for religious gnu faggots

all packages are distributed in binary. you know, binary? like, something gnufags hate? in fact debian is pretty antignufag

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-15 21:57

Anyways, >>1->>58 please listen to me. Not that it's really related to this thread. I went to check out Ubuntu a while ago; you know, Ubuntu? Well anyways there was an insane number of people downloading it, and I couldn't get past the front page. Then, I looked at the banner posted at the top of the page, and it had "KDE" written on it. Oh, the stupidity. Those idiots. You, don't come to Linux just because it has KDE, fool. It's only KDE, the K-DESKTOP ENVIRONMENT for crying out loud. There're even entire families here. Family of 4, all installing some Ubuntu, huh? How fucking nice. "Alright, daddy's gonna run Konqueror!" God I can't bear to watch. You people, I'll give you XGL and Compiz/Beryl if you get out of this community. Linux should be a bloody place. That tense atmosphere, where two niggers on opposite sides of the street can start a fight at any time, The stab-or-be-stabbed mentality, that's what's great about Coonix. Women and children should screw off and stay home. Anyways, I was about to start initializing my raid array, and then the bastard beside me goes "Install Updates with Synaptic Package Manager." Who in the world uses the synaptic package manager, you moron? I want to ask him, "do you REALLY want to have everything installed FOR you?" I want to interrogate him. I want to interrogate him for roughly an hour. Are you sure you don't just want to try saying "install updates"? Coming from a Debian veteran such as myself, the latest trend among us vets is this, apt-get dist-upgrade. That's right, apt-get dist-upgraade. This is the vet's way of managing packages. Apt-get dist-upgrade means more freedom than hand-holding. But on the other hand the risk of breaking existing configuration files is a tad higher. This is the key. And then, it's delicious. This is unbeatable. However, if you do this this then there is danger that you'll be marked by the package maintainers from next time on; it's a double-edged sword. I can't recommend it to amateurs. What this all really means, though, is that you, >>1->>58, should just stick with today's special.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-15 23:08

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 0:14

>>58
you obviously didn't hear the second word. gnu hates "binary ONLY". debian has sources available for all packages.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 0:25 (sage)

>>58
Your post added nothing new except a lot of horrible grammar. Saging because you are a fucking moron.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 3:51

>>61
EVERY distro MUST have ALL sources available for the distributed packages. Even Ubuntu and OpenSuSE.
If not, they'd have problem with the licenses of ~90 of the distributed software.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 3:51

>>63
fuck!
If not, they'd have problem with the licenses of ~90 % of the distributed software.

fixed...

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 4:18

>>63
so, what the hell is your point?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 4:39

>>61
GNU hates anything, and it particularly hates binary distribution because they are a bunch of losers with too much time on their hands and too much CPU power available to waste compiling shit OVER AND OVER AND OVER, with all those piece of shit of a mess configure scripts and makefiles.

BTW, for all small to medium-sized projects, and unless you anal your users to compile it themselves, the sum of the time saved by using make to avoid recompiling modules is lower than the time you spend on writing the makefile and all.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 5:36

this thread full of lol. >>66 is a prime example.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 6:48

Windows is better. Where else do you get a box of mystery that is fun to reverse and randomly shuts down? There's just no point or fun in reverse engineering open source software or stable systems where information isn't hidden.

Hell, you can even get these idiots to pay money for a product that just simply calls a few system functions.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 8:54

>>62
There are no grammatical errors in the post you pointed to. This suggests that you, in fact, are stupid.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 9:20

ITT: distro wars
Go go go go go go
amidoingitrite?

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 9:56

apt, start an os war

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 10:09

>>70
Yes.

OpenSuSE: Crap
*buntu: Debian for newbies
Debian: Hardcore
Slackware: Hardcore
Fedora: Nice
Mandriva: HEY PAY MONEY FOR STUFF YUO CAN GET FOR FREE
Xandros: See Mandriva
Linspire: See Xandros
Freespire: Hay, we have a crappy free version, so that ppl will at least start to care about Linspire!
Arch: Our blazing new package manager is so modern and ultra great that it looks just like dpkg/apt - just more confusing
Gentoo: I REALLY believe that programs are faster when I compile them myself. Really! Hey, BELIEVE ME DAMMIT!
FreeBSD: Who needs a package manager when you can just compile Gnome yourself or download it with wget?
NetBSD: We are for servers. The rest: FreeBSD
OpenBSD: HA! We had just 1 security hole in the minimum installation since 1995!!!! Unfortunately, with the minimum install, all you can do is write text-files.
Windows: Here master, let me be your chauffeur! Oh, it seems that there is a bend, would you like me to use the steering-wheel? / Oops, I think I borked the car. Please fix it yourself by buying a new one.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 10:43

rpm -Uvh os_war_2007016.rpm

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 10:49

>>73
Disk full

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 10:49

>>73
Also, RPM sucks

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 10:55

>>75
>>73
Can't resolve package dependencies:
requires brain_1.0 but it's not installed
requires humor_4.2.22-3 but it's not installed
requires macfags_0.01 but it's not installed

REAL men use YaST. Not because it's great or 1337, but because it breaks as easily as Windows 98.

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 11:04

rpm -Uvh --nodeps os_war_2007016.rpm

bitches dont know about my --nodeps

Name: Anonymous 2007-01-16 14:49

rpm makes my stomach hurt. i'll never use an rpm distro.

Name: rugged tablet computer 2011-07-20 20:46

Its first Windows-based mobile phone is slated for launch in Australia in the first half of next year.
 
I think its a stepping stone, a bridge if you like to our Windows platform strategy, http://www.airchellphones.com cheap mobile phones uk http://www.airchellphones.com cheap mobile phones uk http://www.aircellphones.com/windows-mobile-phones.html  windows mobile 6 http://www.aircellphones.com/windows-mobile-phones.html  windows mobile 6 Mr Carr said http://www.airchellphones.com head set http://www.airchellphones.com head set.

Name: Roger 2011-07-21 1:11

Windows phone just plain sux...

http://beauty-thailand.net/

Name: Anonymous 2011-07-23 20:35

um.....puppy linux is the best portable os

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-02 21:40

ONE WORD DEBIAN THREAD OVER.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-07 22:03

I started with Debian. Its geat. Gonna' probably switch back to it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-08-07 22:26

>>1 Debian. I started with that.
Fedora is alright if you know how to fucking google. One of my friends started with that, but the fagstorm wouldn't google for solutions when he ran into problems.
Heard ubuntu is real good for beginners, but I've never tried it.

>>32 Do you really want a car that randomly shuts down or suddenly stops and freezes while using it?
Fuck Bill and his shit Windows.

Name: tall ugg boots black 2011-09-26 6:53

in the morning with them.The construction of the shoe as a whole is very good. http://www.comeboot.com/  Black UGG Boot for Sale. http://www.comeboot.com/  Black UGG Boot for Sale They are thick, strong and a good feeling with his feet. http://www.comeboot.com/  Black Boots for Sale. http://www.comeboot.com/  Black Boots for Sale The heat they offer is wonderful. I'm very happy I purchased this title http://www.comeboot.com/ugg-classic-cardy-boots.html  Classic Cardy UGG Boots. http://www.comeboot.com/ugg-classic-cardy-boots.html  Classic Cardy UGG Boots. I

Name: formal short dresses 2012-05-13 1:42

Adrianna Papell evening dresses any woman attending formal party will surely stand out from the crowd. The materials used in their evening dresses are made from high quality materials. And not only is it high in quality but also offers great comfortability to women wearing it. <br> They have great designs and styles ranging from and elegant overlapping After a background in the music world http://www.portdress.net/  Garter , Phyllis Sika has launched the project about four years ago, driven by the desire to export a taste for bold colors and fabrics, http://www.portdress.net/  womens evening dresses  typical of the Ghanaian culture in the western world  http://www.portdress.net/  formal dresses for wedding . “ When I was little, we went to Ghana every summer to work the ropes and watched fascinated and thought it was a pity that

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List