>>2
LISTEN TO THIS MAN
>>3
Dreamweaver still writes worse HTML than I do, and doesn't give you the same degree of power. Also, it fails at real CSS (as in, cascaded, minimalist, etc), and CSS is more important than HTML.
>>4
As for tables, Dreamweaver uses far too many, but you can't completely get rid of them if you want a page that still works in piece of shit browsers (read: MSIE).