/comp/ - ff 1.5.0.8 > 2.0 imo

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 10:24

.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 11:01

www.opera.com

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 11:16

>>2
no

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 11:25

>>1
Agree. 3.0 had better be amazing.

Also, Konqueror 3.5.5 > *

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 11:45

Agree completely. Installed Firefox 2.0, but went back to 1.5. I use Opera as well, but the firefox extensions are priceless. >>1

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 12:00

>>4
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-trunk/

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 13:37

>>6
Trying it now, but so far, it seems exactly like 2.0 except none of my extensions work (from an enduser's perspective, at least). And none of the new features planned for 3.0 (Gecko 1.9/Cairo/etc) is really going to pull me away from Konqueror and it's KIOSlaves. Oh well.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 14:17

>>7
2.0 is basically 3.0 with some extra memory leaks and instabilities added (otherwise they wouldn't be able to call it a stable release).

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 15:34

2.0 should have been called 1.6, especially considering the shit they took out

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 16:14

Memory is better in 2.0. It used to go up to 300 megs now it's only 100 megs. LOL

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 13:07

What the fuck is up with the download manager? I don't want to use downthemall, just the ff default, but I don't get a choice where to save downloads. Back to 1.5

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 14:01

Firefox 2.0 has encountered a problem and needs to close.

ff 1.5.0.8 > 2.0 imo

1 Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 10:24

2 Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 11:01

3 Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 11:16

4 Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 11:25

5 Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 11:45

6 Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 12:00

7 Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 13:37

8 Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 14:17

9 Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 15:34

10 Name: Anonymous 2006-11-12 16:14

11 Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 13:07

12 Name: Anonymous 2006-11-13 14:01