Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

"Fast Ethernet" = 10 mbit/s?

Name: Junior 2006-11-01 16:24

So, here's the scoop...

I've got a server and a desktop machine in my room, hooked up to a D-Link DSS 1105, which is then subsequently plugged into my D-Link router. My router, switch, and NIC cards are all "Fast Ethernet" or 100 mbit/s, however, whenever I transfer something between the two, it will only go at a max of 1.25 mB/s, or 10 mbit/s.

All my drivers are up to date, and Windows Updates are all installed.  I have no idea what could be the bottleneck here.  To my knowledge all my cables are cat5. 

WTF?

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-01 16:26 (sage)

Sorry, they don't make 100mbit/s hard drives yet.

Name: Junior 2006-11-01 16:35

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-01 16:40

>>2
sorry, you're an troll.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-01 16:59

>>1
Cable length/type/condition, equipment specs/condition, HD speeds (seems this is Windows, so fragmentation could possibly be an issue), processor speed, ...

In short: www.oper--- I mean, install Linux.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-01 17:21

>>5
bullshit, i get ~10mbyte/sec in my lan, windows can't be the issue.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-01 17:35

1. connect computers directly
2. test transfer speed
3. draw conclusions

Name: Junior 2006-11-01 17:56

Number 7, I don't have a cross-over cable to do that.  I've already connected my computer straight to the router, and the speeds are the same, so the problem is not the switch.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-01 19:51

it looks like it's using the net to upload, rather than the LAN.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-01 20:18

>>9
strange, are the systems on the same subnet?

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-01 21:26

"fast ethernet" doesn't mean shit

one of your nics or your switch or your router is only 10 base T, not 10/100 and this is why you fail at networking

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-02 3:02

11

I fail at networking, and you don't know that "Fast Ethernet" is what's used to refer to 100 mb/s in most instances? Do you think I'm not competent enough to read product manuals to ensure that they support 100 mbit/s--or "fast ethernet", as every manual also referred to it as.

Through some trouble-shooting, and a trying a few different routers, I found that the software firewall I was using was the culprit.  Probably due to the fact that it was cracked software--in any case, I guess I'll just be adding more rules to my router.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-02 4:51 (sage)

>>12 I'm not competent enough to read product manuals
That's the reason most people begin threads here. That or trolling.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-02 5:18

BUFFER TO HOST != PLATTER TO BUFFER.

A single IDE hard drive can NOT sustain any transfer rate thas relevent to your interests.

It takes a fuckload of time to get the data into the buffer and for large transfers (anything over the buffer size (2mb to 16mb) the transfer rate will slow to a crawl.


Soloution, set up a RAID in stripe mode, this combines drives and gives you a much better sustained burst, moar drives = faster sustain, whilst one buffer empties the machine works on filling the other(s)

Another way would be to install a fuckload of solid memory storage, this will give you insane speeds and max out your connection.

Bear in mind that the overall speed is also dependant on the client and the server.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-02 19:10

Methinks that >>1-san doesn't understand the difference between megabits per second and megabytes per second. You can indeed transfer around ten megabytes a second on a hundred megabits per second connection (comms overhead and latency eating the extra megabyte).

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-03 8:09

>>12
"Fast Ethernet" doesn't mean shit, GTFO

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-03 8:32

>>16
actually "fast ethernet" is the term for 100mbit ethernet, asswipe.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-03 12:04

>>17
if your card says "fast ethernet" on it, it doesn't mean shit

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-03 12:26

>>18
Fast Ethernet == 802.3u.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-03 13:46

>>18
http://www.ethermanage.com/ethernet/ethernet.html

just stfu if you have no clue what you're talking about.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-03 15:21

"Fast Ethernet" doesn't mean shit

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-03 15:41

fast is a relative term.
56k is fast compared to 1200 baud.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-03 16:56 (sage)

>>22
``56k'' and ``1200 baud'' are not Ethernet technologies.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-03 19:00

>>23
i think you missed the point.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-03 20:32

"Fast Ethernet" has a very specific meaning. Look up IEEE 802.3u.

Name: Anonymous 2006-11-04 5:12 (sage)

>>24
"i think you missed the point." is not an Ethernet technology.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List