Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Best widget engine?

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 4:20

Whichever has the least crap attached to it.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 4:27

printf();

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 11:36 (sage)

what, fltk gtk, qt or wx widgets not good enough for you?

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 16:50

those have crap attached

Name: sage 2006-08-27 18:14 (sage)

ALRIGHT WHO POOPED ON MY WIDGETS?!

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 19:36 (sage)

>>4
if by crap you mean fully functional and feature rich, then yes they do have crap attached.

Name: j3ph42 !dXldY3fJbY 2006-08-27 22:09

>>6
No, I personally defecated, and duct taped my feces to gtk and qt. I had RMS tied to a chair and made him watch the whole thing. Hence it has crap attached.

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 9:14

>>2
write(1, buffer, count)

Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 19:14

I've no idea what a widget engine is, but I think WxWidgets might answer the question you meant to ask. _All_ of these toolkits have crap attached. if that bothers you, stick to the command line (which, incidentally, is often a more useful interface for people with a clue).

Best widget engine?

1 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 4:20

2 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 4:27

3 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 11:36 (sage)

4 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 16:50

5 Name: sage 2006-08-27 18:14 (sage)

6 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-27 19:36 (sage)

7 Name: j3ph42 !dXldY3fJbY 2006-08-27 22:09

8 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 9:14

9 Name: Anonymous 2006-08-28 19:14