Name: Anonymous 2006-08-04 23:11
So I hear there's rumors on the internets about 2000/2003 Server being better than XP, but alas, Google is of little help. I recall some anon from /g/ saying something to the effect of "If you don't know why 2000 beats XP, you don't need to downgrade"; however, being the curious little bastard I am, I ask you, /comp/, which OS reigns supreme in the following categories: low memory usage (read: fewest useless services), security, and stability? A miscellaneous and/or compelling reasons is fine too.