oh for fucks sake apple

first the region settings are unnecessarily stubborn and locked, AND NOW i find out that screencapping dvds is prohibited! EEEYYYYAAAAARGHHHHHHH.

fuck you, apple! fuck you and your restrictions! may you burn in hell!!
'


right, so that was a bit melodramatic, but honestly, what are they trying to protect by not allowing us to screencap? that we will use them to pirate dvds? good god. it infuriates me.

potential copyright? Ithink its the same reason you arent allowed to take cameras including still cameras in the cinema. (I dont know bout anyone else but my local cinema has that policy)

>>2
well yeah, but that's a stupid technicality. if someone want's movie caps for a graphic or whatever, they can get it from magazines and whatnot, lift them from the official site, etc. preventing dvd capping isn't going to drastically improve copyright issues. it just means that people will be more frustrated when they just want to grab a screen. ahhhhhhh.

1. Use VLC
2. Use Terminal to take screen captures of DVD's. (Google It)
3. n00b LOL

>>1
That and Apple treating Mighty Mouse like it's a new invention.

LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX LINUX

LINUX IS TOO EXPENSIVE

Does Apple even give back a tenth of what they've taken from the open source community?

Does anyone even give back a tenth of what they've taken from the open source community?

Pirating gives back to the open source community.

>>6
i would use it people made versions of programs for it. thats the biggest issue.

>>1

That's why Apple doesn't call themselves "PCs".  Because a PERSONAL COMPUTER is supposed to be YOUR loyal servant, not the other way around.

>>12
That and in the old days, when somebody referred to PCs they meant IBM compatibles.