Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

TRON OS

Name: B-TRONer 2006-03-10 5:51

TRON is Teikoku-daigaku Real-time Operating system Nuculeus.
In aaall-OS , TRON isss fastesttttt!!!!!
Now , talk about TRON OS.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-10 12:23 (sage)

fuck you

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-10 17:46

OS X is better.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-10 17:49

QNX!

Oh wait, they were bought out. Teh suck.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-18 23:08

TRON have started in 10 sec.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-18 23:59

>>2
Thank you.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-19 0:02

>>3
TRON>Mac>>>>Windows

TRON is best OS.
TROn is best Computer project.
TRON is best in all OSs and computers.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-19 0:07

M$Win has started in 5 min.
BTRON has started in 5 sec!

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-23 4:46

To all.

Please use BTRON.



* If you have $250,
BTRON specification OS, "Chokanji 4 (Super Kanji 4): Operating System"
http://www.personal-media.co.jp/welcome-e.html
http://www.chokanji.com/download/ck4eng.html

* If you have $25,
"Hajimete Miyou Taikenban de Chokanji - TRON he no first-step"
Trial version for BTRON - TRON way's first step
http://www.amazon.co.jp/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/books/4893622153/

* If you haven't $0 even,
1B/V3Trial version
http//web.archive.o/...
http//web.archive/...

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-25 5:07

up

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-25 5:14

GTFO, spamming fool.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-25 5:53

PRESS BTRON
RECEVE BACON

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-29 15:32

>>10
Sorry, it cannt use now.
Shall you buy or rent the trial version ?

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-29 15:34 (sage)

FACT: Japanese software sucks.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-29 15:35

>>11
I never have done spam.
I'll teach you that you can use BTRON in lower price.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-29 15:37

>>12
You cannt understand BTRON.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-29 15:42

>>14
No, it is'nt fact. It is your opinion.

BTRON is a hyper operating system.
For, BTRON has a hyper-network system.
It's name is "Jisshin/Kashin (Entity/Avatar) System".

It is lite.
It is easy.
It is deep.

It lets you dive in your mind and brain.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-29 16:12 (sage)

>>15,>>16,>>17 same spamming faggot
GTFO, fool.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-29 19:02

Are you posting from BTRON? What's it like? Where are English specs of it?

I need to know at least the following: Platforms it's available for? Is it a RTOS, a general purpose OS, or something different? Does it support multitasking/protected mode/virtual memory/threads/fibers/subsystems/security/direct IO? What kind of kernel is it? Is it filesystem-based? And if so, does it have volumes (as in Win32) or a single root (as in Unix)? Separate system objects from files (as in Win32) or joint (as in Unix)? Filesystem format support? Mounting support? Is the filesystem case-sensitive (i.e. anal)? Is it POSIX compilant or Win32 compatible? What kind of IPC does it have (shared memory, pipes, named pipes, native sockets, message queues, other)? Memory mapped files? What does its API cover (TCP/IP (BSD sockets?), framebuffers, GUI, mice, other input devices, RPCs...)? Character set and i18n support? Can you compile the GNU tools for it? C compiler? Other compilers and interpreters? Available software? Any special SDKs? Documentation?

Of course, this is probably a /b/tard obsessed with a SUPERIOR operating system, and he probably didn't understand shit about what I asked.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-29 19:37

>Of course, this is probably a /b/tard obsessed with a SUPERIOR operating system, and he probably didn't understand shit about what I asked.

Truth was told!

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-30 0:56

>>14
you make me lold.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-01 18:46

>>19

I found some specs. Here they are... I agree, that other dude probably doesn't even understand...

http://www.assoc.tron.org/eng/document.html

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-01 19:37

No TRON for the desktop?  Me am sad.  ;_;

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-02 5:49

TRON is still in production...You sure you want to put it on your machine anyway?

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-02 12:09

Why not?  It's already in my electronics.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-02 13:10

Just saying, it doesn't seem fully developed...

If it is, then my bad, but I wouldn't put anything on my hardware unless I knew it was at 100 percent.

Anyway, what makes it so great? I'm just curious...

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-02 14:49 (sage)

>>26
I wouldn't put anything on my hardware unless I knew it was at 100 percent.
No windows for you then?

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-02 15:24 (sage)

>>27

Nor Linux

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-02 15:50

>>27

Exactly, NO windows. Windows has ALWAYS sucked balls. The only thing it has going for it at this time is that there is a huge amount of software and hardware compatible with it. Leaving Bill Gates hanging with his fly open is the greatest thing in life, IMO

Tho, Vista does have some interesting features. Even though they already exist on another OS...

>>28

Ditto on that one. Linux is NOT ready for the majors. Tho, it is a good idea at heart.

All I'm saying is that I'm curious as to what makes this Japanese software so all fired great. Both Linux and Window$ are useable and work more or less. I don't know ANYTHING about this TRON OS and would like an appetizer before sinking my teeth into studying it deeper. I mean, if I need a robot or something, Japan's the place to go. But, to my knowledge, they just are not known for spectacular computer software.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-02 16:03

No windows? No Linux? ENJOY UR VMS!!!1

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-02 16:20 (sage)

                                     ______
          `````|````` |`````````,  .~      ~.  |..          |
               |      |'''|'''''  |          | |  ``..      |
               |      |    `.     |          | |      ``..  |
               |      |      `.    `.______.'  |          ``|

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-03 7:43

>>19
Yes.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-03 7:43

>>19
Yes.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-03 8:01

Are you posting from BTRON?

Yes, I'm posting from BTRON now.

What's it like?

BTRON'feeling is lite and deep with "Jisshin/Kashin model".
If you use BTRON for 1 year, your brain and BTRON fuse with eath.

Where are English specs of it?

Here, please.
www.tron.org
http://www.tron.org/index-e.html
SAKAMURA Laboratory
http://www.sakamura-lab.org/
TRON Web
http://tronweb.super-nova.co.jp/homepage.html

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-03 8:06 (sage)

Can we stop encouraging this shitcock please.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-03 9:25

A

T
R
O
N

is fine too...

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-03 9:41

Q04: I need to know at least the following:
 Platforms it's available for?

BTRON can be use on x86 or i386.

Q05:Is it a RTOS, a general purpose OS, or something different?

ITRON is a RTOS for small.
CTRON is a RTOS for large.
BTRON is a general purpose OS.
MTRON is "DOKODEMO computer" in 1984.
 ;In U.S. it had been called  Ubiquitous Computing in 1987.

Q06: Does it support
q06-1:multitasking/
Yes.
q06-2:protected mode/
None.
q06-3:virtual memory/
Yes.
q06-4:threads/
None.
q06-5:fibers/
None.
q06-6:subsystems/
Nnn...yes, it's called Jisshin/Kashin model.
q06-7:security/
None.
q06-8:direct IO?
None.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-03 9:42

>>19
Q07:What kind of kernel is it?
Original.
ITRON is a name of a subproject, specifications, and OSs, kernels.
CTRON is same.
BTRON is same.
MTRON is difficult to write for you, but it isnt kernel, it is Meta.

Q08:Is it filesystem-based?
Yes, BTRON has a original filesystem.
BTRON has a network filesystem.
It's called Jisshin/Kashin model.

q08-1:And if so, does it have volumes (as in Win32) or a
single root (as in Unix)?
Neither.
Original be it parfectlly.

Q09:Separate system objects from files (as in Win32) or
joint (as in Unix)?

Separate.

Q10:Filesystem format support?
Yes. BTRON can read FAT32&16.

Q11:Mounting support?
None.

Q12: Is the filesystem case-sensitive (i.e. anal)?
YES.

Q13:Is it POSIX compliant or Win32 compatible?
Neither.
But, BTRON can be on Win32 compatible machine.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-03 9:43

>>19
Q14:What kind of IPC does it have (shared memory, pipes, named pipes, native
sockets, message queues, other)?
Yes.
It IS Jisshin/Kashin model.

Q15:Memory mapped files?
None.

Q16:What does its API cover (TCP/IP (BSD sockets?), framebuffers, GUI, mice, other input devices,
RPCs...)?
BTRON's API names are "BTRON3" for x86, "T-Shell" for embeded.
q16-1:TCP/IP
Yes.
q16-2:framebuffers
Yes.
q16-3:GUI
Yes.
q16-4:mice
Yes.
q16-5:other input devices
An electronic-pen was.
;BTRON has been designed for the electronic-pen.
Touch-screen like Nintendo DS have been now, if U.S. break in TRON Project.
q16-6:RPCs
None.
But JAVA and RPC are sons of TRON.
HyperCard in Mac and OLE in win are sons of Jisshin/Kashin model in BTRON.

Name: Anonymous 2006-04-03 9:44

>>19
Q17:Character set and i18n support?

Character set of BTRON is TRON code.
TRON code is meta-code.
TRON code covers an original-code, unicode, GB, JIS, etc...
On BTRON, their can be used equally at a time.

Q18:Can you compile the GNU tools for it?

I can't, and you can't.
Be free from UNIX.
TORN is TRON.

Q19:C compiler?
Yes.
Q20:Other compilers and interpreters?
BTRON has "Micro-Script" and "Programming-Launguege T".
"Micro-script" is light and visual and easy like LEGO brock.
"Programming-Launguege T" can have one "Micro-script" programming in Japanese.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List