Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Norton Corprate Edition

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 5:24

I recently grabbed a copy of the corprate edition of norton anti-virus, and it seems to be alot better then Norton 2006, 2005, or 2004. Reminds me of the old days, back when Norton was actully good.
Anyone else know anything about Corprate Edition? I know that it's got extreamly low resource usage(extreamly important for me), but just woundering if anyone knows anything else about it?

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 5:35

AV software is the Wrong Thing. It does not solve the virus problem. Use an OS that does not execute any old piece of code it finds lying around.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 7:17

>>2
You aren't in charge of anything serious, are you? Even in Linux, a malicious program could modify another providing it has write permission. If it's a script virus/trojan, even easier. This works for any OS.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 8:02

Norton has AIDS.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 8:04

>>3
I didn't mention Linux.

The OS should assume everything is bad and refuse to let it run unless proven otherwise. Trying to maintain a list of bad things and check to see if a given program is on the list is self defeating.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 10:39

>>4 Norton is AIDS.

Fixed.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 11:06

>>5
And how will you prove it's good genius?

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 11:13

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 11:14

>>7
see >>8

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 14:05

>>2
This is for my Gaming rig. I use Linux on my web developer rig.


And I know Norton has/is AIDS, which suprises me when I installed Corprate edition. As far as I can tell, it's AIDS free

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-02 14:36

Yeah - same solid engine/definitions, none of the horrific bloat. It's sad that consumer Norton is, at its core, one of the best anti-virus programs out there, but is encumbered with so much unnecessary shit. Symantec Corporate FTW.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-03 0:31

panda rulez.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-03 3:47

startkeylogger

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-03 5:45

>>13
Anonymous has been kicked from #this_thread

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-03 6:39

Symantec has disgraced Norton's name :(

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-03 10:54

Use NOD32 instead. It is superior in all ways. Scan-benchmarks, low cpu/mem-usage, update-frequency, finding-tests, everything.

>>13
It was posted on slashdot. Therefore attention was given to it and it was fixed. Find your own exploitZZ.

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-03 11:38

>>15
Is NOD32 Japanese?

Name: Anonymous 2006-03-03 18:17

>It was posted on slashdot. Therefore attention was given to it and it was fixed. Find your own exploitZZ

Wait, what? What's the story on that, exactly?

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List