Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Error deleting folder

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-25 20:42

i have this gay folder on my start menu and i want to delete it.
the problem is, i cant. it says "Cannot delete file: Cannot read from the source file or disk"   WTF?

Name: CCFreak2K !mgsA1X/tJA 2005-10-25 22:54

Check its path.  Try navigating to the path, then going one up.

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-26 10:23

have you rebooted since you deleted it? because the startmenu has a really common glitch where you'll delete an object, and it will recreate itself for every delete, and none of them actually work since they'll all be deleted.. i think.

try ending explorer and using the command shell, before going for delete-at-reboot programs.

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-26 17:47

And run chkdsk, of course. Also, try navigating to it via the command prompt and seeing if it shows up there. Use dir /x to show its 8.3-format name (eg. FOLDER~1), and delete that (del FOLDER~1).

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-26 18:04

>>4
del FOLDER~1
more liek deltree folder~1

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-26 18:51

rd /s /q folder~1

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-26 19:44

Copylock is your friend. Google it. It's easy to come across, and has worked 100% of the time whenever I had a file stuck, such as a trojan or being used by Explorer.

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-26 19:45

>>5
deltree isn't a valid command in 2000/XP's command line. The 1990's called, they want their command back.

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-27 22:07

>>8
And this is why 2k+ is inferior.

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-28 4:55

>>9
Of course. I'd stick with an obsolete and unstable operating system over the lack of a couple of old DOS commands too.

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-28 5:07

>>9
There's rmdir (rd) for that, tard; the Windows NT bundled commandline utilities provide a complete superset of functionality than that of the crappy, deprecated Windowses.

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-28 8:09

I thought rd only worked on empty directories? Deltree was the DOS equivalent of rm -r

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-28 9:45

>>12
Normally yes, but that's what the switches are for. rd /s removes all files and subdirectories within the directory too (and /q does it without prompting all the time).

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-28 9:52

I doubt >>9 was serious. >>10 and >>11 fail.

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-29 0:14

>>14
Disregard that. I suck cocks.

Name: threadstarter 2005-10-29 22:19

>>6
works, thx

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-30 4:15

format

Name: Anonymous 2005-10-30 8:21

>>17
It won't clear data, stupid

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List