/comp/ - computer

Name: Anonymous 2005-07-06 23:47

What do you think of this

AMD Athlon 64 3700+ - $325
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819103539

Motherboard - $97
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813180064

2x 1GB (2 x 512 Mb) Ram - $160
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820145440

Case - $70
http://www.crazypc.com/Merchant2/merchant.mv?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=8112

550W Power Supply - $56
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16817182010

160GB Hard drive - $80
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16822144203

Name: Anonymous 2005-07-07 14:34

I haven't used any of the newer AMD chips; but all of the amd k6's I've ever come across have been flaky as shit. For that reason, I stick to Intel.

Name: Anonymous 2005-07-07 17:27

K6? Get out of the past, man. This is 2005.

Name: Anonymous 2005-07-07 18:06

>>2 that's why I specified that I hadn't used any of the *newer* chips. What I have tried makes me distrust them. I don't esp have any reason to think they've changed.

Name: Anonymous 2005-07-08 0:10

they're a LOT better, trust me

Name: Anonymous 2005-07-08 1:32

Last I checked, it was Intel who was had the most recent problems. Remember the Pentium III 1.13?

Name: Anonymous 2005-07-08 4:41

Hahaha K6.
I had a K5 once.

Nigga please, AMD have been a quality source of processing power ever since the Thunderbird.

Name: Anonymous 2005-07-08 5:46

>>7
Speaks the truth. K5 and K6s sucked big time, but since the TB I haven't been using anything not from AMD.

computer

1 Name: Anonymous 2005-07-06 23:47

2 Name: Anonymous 2005-07-07 14:34

3 Name: Anonymous 2005-07-07 17:27

4 Name: Anonymous 2005-07-07 18:06

5 Name: Anonymous 2005-07-08 0:10

6 Name: Anonymous 2005-07-08 1:32

7 Name: Anonymous 2005-07-08 4:41

8 Name: Anonymous 2005-07-08 5:46