Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

linux window managers!

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-28 1:18

anyone use any cool window managers!
not kde or gnome, they are boring

my laptop uses evilwm which is awsome and super minimalistic and the whole program is like 30k. it doesnt even have window decorations, only a 1 pixel border.

my desktop uses xfce 4.2, which is nice too, but not as cool as evilwm. its a little like gnome lite, uses gtk themes and everything.

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-28 1:40

fluxbox for minimal, enlightenment for fullblown

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-28 7:45

I still have a soft spot for fvwm95.

I've heard that ninewm is lightweight and quick, but I've never tried it.

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-28 19:54

Wow only 30k? Damn, that really matters when I have 512mb of ram. Anywho, if I had to choose something other than KDE it would be xfce.

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-28 21:28 (sage)

Windowmaker, openbox, fluxbox.

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-28 23:26

>>4 obviously you've never tried using any memory intesnsive applications. many of us program, use mozilla, write pages with quantas and serve web pages. The memory saved by using a small, 30k window manager is quickly used up by a more productive application.

Of course, those of you who prefer eye-candy such as KDE over running applications would probably never get what I'm talking about.

Name: Anonymous 2005-02-28 23:32

I used to run Blackbox (back before Fluxbox even existed), but now I just stick to Gnome.

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-01 12:03

>>6
Yeah, I've used all of those. Infact, I've ran OO, Kdevelope, mozilla, azureus, and juk at the same time and didn't notice a thing. Memory is cheap right now if you know where to look.

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-01 16:36

>>6

DOS will leave more free memory for you to run applications. And screw DOS too, all you need is to make bootable applications and take your full RAM for useful stuff.

Of course, I'm not defending bloatware, but you always need services and a decent desktop, and you don't want your 21th century computer looking like CP/M.

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-01 17:35

>>9 of course, it's a trade-off. However, >>4 was poo-pooing having a 30k WM since you could have 'so much' ram; and my point is that memory is _always_ scarce and that if you can have a low-footprint enviroment (while still being functional, of course) then so much the better.

Of course I, like dmr, use an NT-based system, so sometimes one does want the eye-candy.

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-01 17:55

>>7
i still run blackbox on bsd...
but now that i think about it, i should just remove x entirely.. no real use for it on that machine

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-01 20:48

>>10
Well, I didn't say anything was wrong with it, but when you call  KDE and Gnome bloatware like some, it's just stupid.

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-02 5:52

KDE and Gnome are huge. Call call them useful or call them bloatware. Won't change reality.

30k though... not even window decorations? That's throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-02 9:56

KDE at least makes the X environment bearable and somewhat useful. For example, it provides one of the first decent editors ever seen in Unix.

Without KDE X is just a bizarre collection of absolutely different, absolutely incompatible and unintegrated applications, mostly a hundred years old, and not even the clipboard will work half decently.

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-02 13:37

lol people not knowing the difference between a desktop environment (KDE, GNOME/Nautilus), and a window manager (sawfish, fluxbox, etc.) Changing the WM , yet still running the desktop, isn't going to get you anything like you want.

The .xinitrc here is like:

unclutter &
gnome-settings-daemon &
sawfish &
exec gnome1-panel

Sawfish is my favourite WM for being customizable in all the right places.

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-02 15:12

Lol at people forgetting they have a windows manager and some people don't refer to their name by themselves.

Name: Christy McJesus !DcbLlAZi7U 2005-03-09 15:02

xfce4lyfe

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-09 21:44 (sage)

Stop spamming every fucking thread, >>17.

Name: Christy McJesus !DcbLlAZi7U 2005-03-14 9:41

>>18
Calm down, learn what spam is. Following me around complaining about spam is far more off topic than mentioning xfce in a thread about window managers am i rite.

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-14 10:22

>>19

Just like textures are called textures because at first the only thing you'd dream of doing is adding a tiny tiled bitmap to represent more or less of a texture (which is done in a much advanced way today with bump mapping), but later they started calling anything that's painted on a polygon a "texture", even though it may define color, dirt, reflection, etc. Spam now means any random crap (typically short an offtopic) posted to a message board, not only unsolicited commercial advertisement.

How's that for an offtopic?

Name: Christy McJesus !DcbLlAZi7U 2005-03-14 11:05

>>20
What.

Look, don't make me start typing in caps at yu0.

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-14 16:53

>>17
Oh no, great master, tell me what spam is!!!

All your utterly inane comments just drag down the S/N ratio in the forum. How about a little meat to your comments? "xfce4lyfe" is what a 13-year-old would write - a pathetic attempt at humor and devoid of meaning.

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-15 0:26

oh shut the fuck up allof u

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-15 2:16

I just use Gnome....  Pretty basic...  Gets the job done for me.

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-15 3:13

i used to use pekwm and the evilwm-p theme which i found awesome. after reading some osnews article about fvwm i took a liking in it and switched, redoing the evilwm theme of course =O

Name: Christy McJesus !DcbLlAZi7U 2005-03-15 6:12

>>22
Because obviously your aspie whining isn't noise.
I didn't come here for drama, leave me out of it.

Name: Anonymous 2005-03-15 18:32

>>26
lol but that's drama anyways

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List