Ok, now people have been saying that Harry Potter is just a little kids book, with no real depth, but Im begining to beleive the people saying this have not gotten past the first book. Yes, at first glance, the first book and maybe the second seem a bit kiddish. But, I, loving literary analysis, see beyond that. JKR is an amazing writer, you hides things within the story, in the smallest of things. It has real depth if you look closely, which Is what i like to see in literature. ANyone else agree?
Name:
Anonymous2007-03-27 11:23 ID:u7jOZIdJ
Ok, now people have been saying that Harry Potter is just a little kids book, with no real depth, but Im begining to beleive the people saying this have not gotten past the first book. Yes, at first glance, the first book and maybe the second seem a bit kiddish. But, I, loving literary analysis, see beyond that. JKR is an amazing writer, you hides things within the story, in the smallest of things. It has real depth if you look closely, which Is what i like to see in literature. ANyone else agree?
Harry Potter is a story about a young man who got out of the closet and serviced many men. His good friend Ron decides he's not a faggot and bangs 'Hermione' Jean Granger instead [THE MOVIE PRONOUNCES IT 'HER-MY-NEE', how the fuck did that happen?].