Da Vinci Code

So finnaly read it cus people recommended it to me as best book ever...and I say its worst crap ever, even small format books like  Ghost War from Michael A.S. have more contents, all the twist and untwists are shitty, etc...now how the fuck do people find this book best book ever is beyond me...unless they are as dumb as the Dan.

people are sheep.

American christ-fuckers like that shit. Nuff said.

>>2

*signs*

I enjoyed reading it until I found out it was bullshit.  Then I thought that I'd wasted a valuable couple hours reading it.

It is bullshit in that he basically steals and bastardizes someone else's legitimate and probably more interesting research and injects it into a craptacular novelization, as a recipe for a bestseller. But if it was an enjoyable read for you, you still shouldn't care, lol.

>>6
But the "history" is the only reason to actually give a damn.  Once you check the itnernet and find out that all the facts he ripped off of Holy Blood, Holy Grail were bullshit there's no reason to care about the book anymore.

Well I haven't read it, so I don't know if it's a good "thriller" or not. Is it really that horrible a book other than the speculative historical stuff?

>>8

Besides the fact that the writing is crap and the 'suspenseful' plot is basically a boatload of cliches and contrived events, gee, it's wonderful.

Did I mention the bland characterisation or the Hollywood-style terse dialogue? No?

"He woke up Tom Hanks-ishly"