>>77
I never said he should go to art school.
I even posted this >>30
Why would he need to go to art school with all those connections he already has.
Name:
Anonymous2013-04-10 13:41
Some animators don't even go to art school. Obari just visited studios and talked to animators, they trained him in meetings and eventually they hired him.
Name:
Anonymous2013-04-10 13:43
>>77
It's both. Same for Kou, it can be spelt Koh too. It's different methods of romanisations.
Name:
Anonymous2013-04-10 13:44
>>79
Hiroyuki Okiura didn't even go to college.
Miyazaki studied political science and economics, not art.
Art doesn't need any social education system.
Bahi: I’m thankful to be working with and learning from very talented artists, I feel like a student during a production and all the others are my teachers.
So for him working in the anime industry is like studying animation.
mamoru oshii said the same thing about the car cut in innocence (that cut with the cur passing through that shopping district with many lights or whatever it was), while trying to deny that it wasn't cg (which it wasn't). turned out it was rotoscoped. it's on the bd commentary. point is, I for one wouldn't listen to bahi dj who's pretty outspoken about rotoscoping. who knows what was asked and what was answered. "I told a friend to ask his friend..." this is third hand information already.
He basically says that right now he is working in Imaishi's upcoming anime and asks people to look forward to it. He also says that even if he is a total noob right now he would like to try to get another director work in the future.
Name:
Anonymous2013-04-10 13:58
>>85
I think you wouldn't even believe if Ohira would personally say that it's not rotoscoped.
If Bahi JD tells me who that friend of his is, then I might find the tweet less doubtful. I'm not going to believe a kid who says a lot of crap on twitter just because he animated a couple of nice scenes.
hey guize, hey! consider the following: animating from reference is just as "bad" as doing rotoscope.
I always wonder. how come its okay to animate with references but not okay to have the reference under your sheet? a good draftsman can draw from reference just as good as tracing over image. if you draw with reference, you do not animate just like with rotoscope. you just copy movement from footage.
"Proven" is a strong word. Chinese whispers don't really prove anything, only that the channel is faulty.
Name:
Anonymous2013-04-10 14:15
>>95 If Bahi JD tells me who that friend of his is
Why don't you tell us who you are?
animating from reference is just as "bad" as doing rotoscope.
you are right, these Ghibli animators are doing animal abuse http://youtu.be/xLmxKJjas0s?t=3m58s
All this rotoscope hate. That's being so ignorant. It's just a tool. Any good creator knows how and when to use their tools. Including rotoscoping. Some of the most iconic animated films ever have rotoscoped cuts. Cry all you want. There's nothing inherently bad with it. Who gives a shit whether this list is true or not:
Well, the tweet itself is about how Bahi asked a guy to ask a guy, so...
Name:
Anonymous2013-04-10 14:22
Miyazaki did references (have other people act out/photographing himself).
Yasuo Otsuka did the same thing.
Disney had a bunch of animals in their studio when they're making The Lion King.
Glen Keane went to museums and use Greek sculptures as references for the transformation scene of the Beast.
The point is, you don't just copy the references, you study them to make the animation.
You can say the same thing about rotoscoping. "You're just studying". Trace things out, then modify them to fit your "vision". Fucking artfags and your terms. It's all the same shit.
At least state who that friend is so we can know there is actually a connection with Shin'ya Ohira. That tweet sounds too much like various "My dad works for SHAFT" shit you read on /a/ all the time.