Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon.

Pages: 1-

Lolicon is no longer (omg stoled)

Name: kekeke ^_^ 2005-01-15 12:17

http//bo/...

FUN QUOTE:
You can say that lolicon is no worse than playing a video game or watching a movie that depicts violence, but they're apples and oranges.

If you enjoy playing Halo 2, Mortal Kombat, etc; it doesn't mean that you are going to go around shooting people, impalling them, hacking them up, eating them, turning them into a baby, etc. As for loli, the viewer is obviously attracted to underdeveloped girls. I would say underaged, but you get your cyborg and android type characters who are fully developed and have adult intelligence (Dizzy, Dorothy, etc).

>>IS THIS DENIAL?

Discuss.

Name: Anonymous 2005-01-15 16:46

Dizzy and Dorothy Wayneright are not loli. Their existence is underage, but their physical and mental ages are well of age.

Name: 2 2005-01-15 16:51

Wow, I lose for absolutely having no idea what I just said or what you just quoted.

 And it's the GameFAQs message boards. What do you expect from a group of kids who whine about EVERYTHING?

Name: Anonymous 2005-01-15 17:42 (sage)

The Gamefaqs forum is where I go for intelligent conversation.

Name: Anonymous 2005-01-15 20:58

more like gamefags

Name: Anonymous 2005-01-15 23:26

ur all rite.
Winnar

Name: Anonymous 2005-01-19 20:46

in a way its true, most men and wemon are attracted to underage boys, or girls, with reason.

girls are ment to start haveing kids at 13 so they develope than, and boys can have sex at the least 11, so yea some ware in that range is where you arnt a freak. its there you are attracted to 10 or less that it is a bit disturbing and in almost everyones eyes wrong.

Name: DJ Saltack 2005-01-22 19:59

Of course, our minds have evolved in the past half million years. Now we can suffer psychological harm from early sex if done the wrong way.

Name: DJ Saltack 2005-01-22 19:59

Of course, our minds have evolved in the past half million years. Now we can suffer psychological harm from early sex if done the wrong way.

Name: Anonymous 2005-01-22 22:31

You can suffer psychological harm from sex done the wrong way at ANY age.  In our society, sex at such an age will almost certainly be harmful to the psyche.  However, it seems likely that it would be possible to have a society where having sex at an age near puberty would not be harmful.  For another thing, a 13 can't really raise a kid very well - however, in many tribal societies, children were raised in a much more communal manner than they are in today's world, so this is less of a problem.

Basically, sex with kids in any kind of modern society = don't do it.  3000 years ago?  Maybe not.  We haven't really had much/any physical evolution since then, although society has certainly become more complex.

Name: lycoris 2005-01-23 17:22

Concider this, sex and violence are always related. underaged girls/boys are innocent which give us the feeling of power and strength. humans are more or less agressive and its always true. people want to CONTROL/ENSLAVE lolicons as they were being controled/enslaved, nowdays stress and pressure are what living in a city's all about.

Name: Anonymous 2005-01-24 16:00

Kick the dog, eh? Hurting kids is wrong, period.

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-09 13:35

2005 bump~

Name: Anonymous 2013-05-09 13:54

>>13
Faggot.

Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List