Sorry for the time gap, internet fucked up.
But 156, 158 here.
>>159
I agree, that is I believe it would work. The risk of luring trolls is low.
>>160
Agreed as well, provide it for the /b/ros here. Any suggetions on images?
>>161
Well it is a bit "old".
>>162
I don't doubt there are some decent contribuitors who are fairly new to /b/, it just so happens that most of the newcomers are the cause of the "cancer". I apologize for being label as one entity, if you share our perspective and support what is trying to be done here you are more than welcomed here.