I's has no clues about rape.

If I went on "Who wants to be a millionaire?" and someone would ask me "What's wrong with rape?", I'd fucking fail the question.

"Wait... Hmm... I KNOW this... Well, I SHOULD know it... 'a) Because it destroys you as a human being.' Sure it stings at first, but the rewards sure outweighs it, and who'd want to be a stupid human anyway? ...so that can't be it. 'b) Because a no is a no.' Ehh?? All the women I've ever known has seemed to enjoy it and crave it, and I'd sure like some too, so that can't be it. ... I'm going to go with 'd) There's nothing wrong with it.'."

Can someone explain the real answer to me, 'cause somehow I don't get it anymore. I must be insane for sure, but yet I feel saner than I've ever done before.

>>11
What 12 said. All moral arguments, including your own, are made from personal beliefs.

1a) There are natural ways in which rape can make one a wiser being: Being exposed to suffering will teach one how to adapt to and handle it, making one a much more harmonious being. ...but if harmony isn't your thing, and you'd rather want to go through life without coping skills, then that's your way of life.

1b) Here you attempt to disprove the scientific method as a personal belief. If I've made inductive research, where some women were not raped, and some were, and the results showed that those raped became kinder and friendlier, while those NOT raped became aggressive and hostile, and where I'm actually searching actively for exceptions to this rule, that's much more than personal opinion.

10) No, not quite. The difference between normal rape and overdoing a rape so that some takes genital damage, is huge for the one being raped. The topic is only the kind of rape which is only damaging to the soul.