Name: Anonymous 2012-11-27 19:19
So I was reading a article about a movie titled "Men in black" and I scrolled down to the comment section.
"Agent Jay: Klansman's litmus test for how a black person behaves, underwent a vigorous selection process for MIB candidacy that left absolutely no question that he was the least qualified man for the job. He is literally a failure across the board -- he shoots a little girl in the face during a training exercise and has a completely derisive disregard for authority."
Would you consider this to be a accurate description of this film?
Or was this the only way they could legally justify racism against Mexicans and sexism against little girls?
http://www.cracked.com/quick-fixes/why-men-in-black-agency-just-huge-con/
___________________________________________________________________________-
What other plot holes bother you?
"Agent Jay: Klansman's litmus test for how a black person behaves, underwent a vigorous selection process for MIB candidacy that left absolutely no question that he was the least qualified man for the job. He is literally a failure across the board -- he shoots a little girl in the face during a training exercise and has a completely derisive disregard for authority."
Would you consider this to be a accurate description of this film?
Or was this the only way they could legally justify racism against Mexicans and sexism against little girls?
http://www.cracked.com/quick-fixes/why-men-in-black-agency-just-huge-con/
___________________________________________________________________________-
What other plot holes bother you?