Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Windows to Linux

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-16 21:41

I'm thinking about switching to Linux. Specifically Ubuntu or Fedora. Anyone want to tell me why or why I shouldn't? Currently using Vista Home and I like it but I just want to see what else is out there. Plus if its more secure, thats always a plus.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-26 11:47

>>40
It's free, for one.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-26 15:07

If you're going to run Windows and Linux at the same time, you might as well use coLinux. It takes a few minutes of setting it up so it works, but it's a lot faster and requires less resources. And like a VM it can run from a file on your normal Windows filesystem so you don't need an extra partition. Did I already mention that you can give it access to Windows files and folders too?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-26 15:27

>>40
VirtualBox has better performance. It's a lot sleeker and the responses are better. If you have worked with both you'll know the difference.

Also it doesn't have those dreaded timing problems on speedstepping CPUs at all, while VMWare just can't get rid of them. It's a really ugly mess, there is a 10+ page PDF document explaining the issue and offering a number of "workarounds". Some of those work to some extent on some hardware while making it worse on different hardware and so on. Bottom line: You have to try around until you get the least possible jitter and hope for your NTP client to be able to keep up.

As for features, you probably won't find much lacking in VirtualBox compared to VMWare. As a bonus VirtualBox has that "seamless" mode for Windows guests, if you're into that.

Oh, and >>41 of course.


>>42
that you can give it access to Windows files and folders too
Any serious virtualization solution lets you do that, no?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-26 22:52

>>42
coLinux boils down to running Linux in a (half-assed) VM under Windows instead of running Windows under Linux. Why the fuck would you run the more stable OS under the less stable one? To have the downsides of both?

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-27 0:12

It is more convenient that way.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-27 18:34

>>45
Except that no it isn't.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-02 8:49

>>43
Thanks. I am gonna try that one out after I am done with my work in VMWare. I don't want to install and configure windows again. :)

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 15:10

The irony is that Linux works better with Windows networking than Windows

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-15 19:47

>>40
You're not limited to what virtual images you can find, it'll run whatever OS you have as an .iso or from a cd just fine. Also, seamless window mode is pwn.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-16 0:24

whats a livecd, how do obtain it? do i just copy an iso to a regular blank cd?

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-21 4:08

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-27 8:05

>>28
As of the the latest Virtualbox(1.5.6). Windows can not run any applications that require DirectX3D rendering while running under Virtualbox.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List