Long cat thread part 2!
1
Name:
Anonymous
2007-09-09 1:26
ID:FfoFfbIt
＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿
121
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-03 0:04
| |
122
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-03 6:22
=============================================================
123
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-04 6:15
| |
124
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-04 6:15
| |
125
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-09 1:31
｜ ｜
126
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-13 6:51
｜ ｜
127
Name:
kenny92
2008-03-13 15:00
｜ ｜
128
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-14 3:44
｜ ｜
129
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-16 0:44
｜ ｜
130
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-17 2:59
｜ ｜
131
Name:
!bn2espeon.
2008-03-18 9:21
｜ ｜
132
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-25 7:18
｜ ｜
133
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-30 14:08
｜ ｜
134
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-30 17:33
｜ ｜
135
Name:
Anonymous
2008-03-30 19:20
｜ ｜
136
Name:
Anonymous
2008-04-04 3:02
｜ ｜
137
Name:
Anonymous
2008-04-04 15:39
/thread
138
Name:
Anonymous
2008-04-05 1:47
｜ ｜
139
Name:
Anonymous
2008-04-05 7:01
｜ ｜
140
Name:
Anonymous
2008-04-08 2:21
/thread
141
Name:
Anonymous
2008-04-11 21:49
｜ ｜
142
Name:
Anonymous
2008-04-11 22:00
>>140
you were one off...
Gaia Online administrator Derek Liu requests that the administration of 4chan.org delete this thread and remove all "Longcat" references from its servers. Longcat and all likenesses thereof are registered trademarks of Gaia Interactive.
144
Name:
Anonymous
2008-04-12 7:30
>>143
____ /\/\
~' ____(ತДತ)
UU U U
>>144
I assure you, this is very serious. Trademark infringement is being committed.
This "longcat" thread is an inferior knockoff of the Gaia Monthly Collectible "Longcat Scarf". If the administration and users of 4chan do not comply with this reaction to the blatant theft of a Gaia character, 4chan.org will be forced to shut down.
147
Name:
Anonymous
2008-04-26 4:15
｜ ｜
148
Name:
Anonymous
2008-04-26 22:08
｜ ｜l
149
Name:
Anonymous
2008-04-27 12:20
｜ ｜
150
Name:
Anonymous
2008-04-27 12:21
｜ ｜l
151
Name:
Anonymous
2008-05-17 8:51
>>146
THIS IS THE FUCKING REASON WHY MOOT PERMABANS FOR GAIAFAGGOTRY.
152
Name:
Anonymous
2008-05-18 20:09
｜ ｜
153
Name:
Anonymous
2008-05-19 1:24
V V lol wut?
154
Name:
Anonymous
2008-05-23 8:27
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
>>151
Don't worry about it. Any trademark claims about public domain "marks of a trade" are probably not worthy of being granted trademark status. If I were the owner of this site, I would just disregard this claim.
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
｜ ｜
155
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-05 0:37
｜ ｜
156
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-08 21:27
｜ ｜
157
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-09 8:25
158
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-19 16:50
＿
159
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-29 21:43
｜ ｜
160
Name:
Anonymous
2008-06-29 22:00
｜ ｜ | |
Newer Posts