>>40
Then why do you have to state it? What should it matter to you one way or the other what anyone else thinks of your sexuality? Your consistent attempts at "defending" your sexual preference is nothing more than a smoke screen for your sexual insecurity. You think you are hetero...but you really aren't certain. If you were, your personal experience would over-ride anything anyone else would have to say. You would know they were just fucking with you. Your personality comes shining through. Just ask yourself the question, "What if...I am queer?"
>>41
But I can insure you that I am no queer! I have made it with plenty of woman!
Name:
Anonymous2010-07-30 18:55
Hey guys remember that time when this thread was about relativity, gravity, mass, density and stuff about science.
Name:
Anonymous2010-08-01 3:34
>>42
making it with women does not make you a heterosexual.
Name:
Anonymous2010-08-01 3:35
>>43
Please, do remind us, we are suffering from old-timers.
:/
Name:
Anonymous2010-08-01 15:11
>>43
That's just a myth propagated by delusional atheists. This thread was never grounded in science in the least.
Name:
Anonymous2010-08-02 6:25
>walk backwards
>take a pencil
>carbon dating
>bend time
>multiple realities
>dark matter
>anti-dark matter
I lul'ed
For fuck's sake though, relativity is not an "optical illusion" Not only does the phrase "optical illusion" imply that it is an illusion created solely by mistakenly-perceived light, which is just flat wrong, each frame of reference's viewpoint of what happens is correct. When the distortion of space-time due to a planet's mass alters the perception of time of a frame of reference inside or out, it does not say that this frame is correct and that one is an illusion....they are both correct, it is just a problem that has to do with simultaneous occurrence when you try to think the situation through that causes so much confusion.