>>24
Here is your statement
>>>
>>17
>>> Only trolls bump threads. So
>>15 doesn't count.
"Only" denotes that bumping threads are solely troll activity making the person that does so a troll to which the one's that "sage" a thread are not trolls.
When you put, "so" at the beginning of your next statement, you are making a conclusion based on the prior premise that "only trolls bump threads" therefore "...
>>15 doesn't count."
Logically;
If "Only trolls bump threads" is true.
Then "
>>15 doesn't count" holds true.
As Well as your direction at
>>17 implies "
>>17 is also a troll for lack of "sage"" as evidenced on this board for all to read.
however you later recanted that
>>17 was not a troll.
Therefore, if your statement of "Only trolls bump threads" is true, then,
>>17 is a troll through implication due to lack of "sage", and
>>15 is not a troll as
>>17 previously stated.
However, if your statement of "Only trolls bump threads" is false, then,
>>17 is not a troll through implication due to lack of "sage" and "...
>>15...trolls." as
>>17 had previously stated remains firm as fact with your statement to back it up.
Which is it?
:/