>>22
your intention of implication is not necessary for there to be an implication provided. One is always provided in everything you say, it's just a matter of logical deduction, "Only trolls bump threads," How many people on here bump threads? Also, since
>>17 is obviously not a troll as you have stated, "I never claimed
>>17 a troll," your statement of "Only trolls bump threads is invalid.
Lrn2logic better
:/