>>19
The nice thing about Lin Al was the bit that I think the lecturer did worst (Or I missed the most lectures on) on weak topology was non-examinable.
Just noticed I wrote analysis where I meant algebra in the post above.
Number fields however was a bastard. I basically taught myself the key bits of the course a week before the exam cause the lectures were shit. Managed to get at least 2 alphas on all the past papers I did, but the questions they set were ridiculous.
For one thing they asked or a proof of dirichlet's unit theorem, which was only "statement of" in the schedules. Also his terminology was incredibly opaque, who refers to ideals as sub Z-modules?!
The one thing I was surprised by was I only dropped 2 marks on galois theory, even though I know for a fact I got half of one of the questions entirely wrong. I got the answer right, but my reasoning was literally nonsense, and to be honest I wouldn't have given me full marks for any of the other questions either.