Pederasty

Is it really that bad? I'm tired of the xians/joos/mooslims bullshit about it and want to hear some rational opinions. Also, please select what you think is the best age group for the boy.

12/13
14/15
or 16+
or 16+?

It's unethical to take advantage of someone who is incapable of making rational decisions. Religion doesn't even enter into it.

It probably depends on person; some are perfectly capable of rational decisions as early as 12.  I think I was mostly rational by 14/15ish.  Certain religifags remain irrational well into their 40s+.

As long as the child is happy, nothing is wrong.

>>2

And in what way is an adolescent boy incapable of making a rational decision, pray tell? You may also include your take on which parts of pederastic relationships are ethical or nonethical, and why. You hillbillys always think pedophelia as soon as someone mentions pederasty. Pederasty is a time honored relatioship, open your mind.

If you come back, Sageman, come with a reference, or keep your BS out of here.

>>3
As long as the child is happy, nothing is wrong.

lol

In central Asia the practice is reputed to have long been widespread, and remains a part of the culture, as exemplified by the proverb, Women for breeding, boys for pleasure, but melons for sheer delight.[48] Though no longer widely practiced, boy marriages nevertheless still occur.[citation needed] In the Ottoman Empire culture, young male dancers, usually cross-dressed in feminine attire, were called Köçek.[citation needed] In the aftermath of the US-Afghan war, western mainstream media have reported derisively on patterns of adult/adolescent male relationships, documented in Kandahar in Afghanistan.[citat

>>3
I think I was mostly rational by 14/15ish.
You're in position to judge that at 16.

>>4
Have you been an adolescent boy?

>>4
Sacrificing animals to "God" was also a time honored tradition, though most would agree today that such an act is a waste of animal life.

>>7
If I'm in a position to make such a judgment at 16, then I'm most certainly in a position to make such a judgment at 21.9.  I'm not sure what your point is.

However, a good point has been brought up.  Why are young children incapable of rational decisions [aside from lack of knowledge and experience]?  I recall reading from wikipedia that one is unable to think abstractly until later in life.  Why is this?  Any bio experts here know something about the biochemistry of the brain?

One of the professors (theoretical physics) here is reputed to have entered college at 12-16ish, and got his PhD when he before he was 24.  Surely, such a person is more than qualified to make rational decisions when he was 12-16ish, right?

>>8
>>7 missed a ``no''. It may make more sense to you if you put it between ``in'' and ``position''.

Surely, such a person is more than qualified to make rational decisions when he was 12-16ish, right?
Regarding sex? No.

>>9
How is sex any different from eating a bowl of cereal or hugging someone?  There's no fancy differential equation that needs to be solved.

>>10
You're my favorite poster.