Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Virginty rates according to majour

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 15:08

http://www.collegian.psu.edu/photos/2007/08/09/3_440x433.jpg

Look at the grah on the right side. Guess who tops the list?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 15:43

Ain't that a shame?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 15:47

For accuracy they should have a "earnings by majour" graph aswel.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 16:33

math major virgin here

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 16:52

wtf computer science?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 17:12

I call bullshit on this graph.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 17:37

should i be happy or sad by this? math major here

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 19:13

math major (equivalent in Europe) here, not virgin

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 19:51

>>8
hey man, fuck you

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 20:27

>>8
gb/2/Studio Art

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 21:08

That's horse-shit! Who tells allows others to know if they are a virgin or not? Poss-ters maybe? And likewise, I majored in philosophy, psychology, mathematics, computer science and look at me now...oh you can't, I forgot. Well, at least you can tell I'm a virgin, right?...oh, wait...you can't. Hmm, let's see, proof, proof...how about if I act like I'm immature will that work? Will that convince you of my sexual-status? Hmm...well, I guess if I post that way I might convince you of the opposite...or maybe I'm a poss-ter myself and just want to fuck with you all cause I haven't had any in 29 years and I'm so horny I can't stop my cock from wanting to jab into people's asses. And like I said before, I won't segregate from people; I'll fuck anyone in the ass cause everyone's got them! HAHAHAHAHAHA! Take that, ya smart-alike.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-02 21:45

For more of the virginity by major thing, read this article:

http://www.gnxp.com/blog/2007/04/intercourse-and-intelligence.php

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-05 22:56

"Another idea is that smarter people are more religious or more ethically conservative, and are trying harder to wait for marriage to have sex."

wtf...

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 0:19

>>13
Read it as
"Another idea is that smarter people are more religious or more ethically conservative, and are trying harder to wait for marriage to have sex."

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 11:34

>>13
Conservatives are more moral, more intelligent and consqeuentially are religious and waiting for marriage to have sex.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 18:00

Intelligent people don't enjoy socialising with morons (meaning most of the population). This reduces the chances of relationships and sexual encounters.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 18:06

anyone who succumbs to lust and perversion is mentally weak.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 18:52

>>17
There's no such thing as perversion.
I thought we had already established that everyone here is a moral relativist.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 18:56

fact: ugly/socially inept people resort to activities of the mind. And the most mental activity is mathematics. Correlation?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-06 18:57

>>18
Not when it comes to furries.

Tentacle rape is a-ok, though. Cultural heritage, and all.

Name: Casual Reader 2008-05-07 7:01

Perversion is the same as normality, just a socially accepted opinion held by the media to pacify the general public... If the media says that a type of behavior or action is acceptable, the general public nodds their heads and goes right back to sucking it's thumbs with their eyes closed......... think on that for awhile... Anything you do my be distasteful to someone, but it's accepted because other people do the same, and if more people do then people who don't, then it becomes normal... This same perspective can also be applied to masterbating with veggitables, if everybody does it then it MUST be OK, and cucumber sales will sky-rocket!! Lol

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-07 13:16

If you stick it in the pooper is that losing virginity?

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-07 15:33

Yup! I popped my a-cherry when I was 5 years old with legos. :)

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-15 22:10

>>15
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Also, well good thing my math is SHIT

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-17 3:09

It's a good thing I'm an English major.  Unless it's counting ESL students. 

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-17 4:11

Second language speakers of English are usually much better at speaking it than American English mother tongue speakers.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-20 14:22

I'm in electrical engineering and the only way anyone can lose their virginity is by going gay.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-20 17:16

That's because mathematicians are too intelligent to waste their time satisfying physical needs with another... Human...

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-20 18:26

>>27
It's okay to cross-pollinate.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-20 20:24

>>28
no it's because we're either ugly/socially inept/have personality disorders. Most people who aren't either 1 out of those 3 don't go into math; it's far too intellectual, solitary, and mental for most social creatures.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-20 20:26

>>30
Which means that we could have had sex, if we cared for making our appearances worthwhile. Even fat, ugly, social people have sex.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-21 7:45

It's just bizarre. There is *something* in the nature of hte mathematician that prevents them from leading the normal, sexually frequentious social life. I think it's to do with how girls are incredibly petty, and the work required to acheive sex, from base level, is just not worth it for so very long.

Name: 4tran 2008-05-21 11:23

Paul Erdos ftw

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-21 19:36

This is why math and intelligence is futile for the human race, since only the stupid will procreate the most.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-21 21:28

>>32
Not only that, but why *have* sex when you can *discover* sex? Yes, "discover sex". Think about that.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-21 22:16

I think you are all rationalizing because you, nay, *we*, can't have sex. Let's face it, math is awesome on an intellectual level, but you are not above your animal heritage. Math can't trump the warm embrace of a woman.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-21 22:23

>>36
As a mathematician, I prefer symbolic logic to physical touch. Even if said touch does happen to warm me considerably. I'll make the rules, and just let everyone else live by them.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-21 22:41

>>37
Yeah, that's what I'd expect a the game to say.

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-21 23:04

>>38
You calculated my response with game theory? Bravo!

Name: Anonymous 2008-05-22 3:46

>>37
maybe it's because you've never been touched.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List