>>22
Once again, you have a cognitive difficulty in understanding what EVIDENCE really is. You have NO EVIDENCE to support the assumption that EVIDENCE can't be collected about your "god".
Your belief in this immature and imaginary thing is all based upon a handful of assumptions that use EACH OTHER as their justifications. However, the need for PROOF is paramount and exceeds any logical structure that you build. The circlejerk of assumptions falls apart when you realize that there's no EVIDENCE anywhere in the loop. The loop of assumptions is therefore invalidated.
... well, invalidated in
logical and rational minds. In religion-addled minds like yours (i.e. quintessentially retarded) it's impossible to reach that invalidation. That's why we rational types have categorized things called MENTAL ILLNESSES in order to put you religitards into appropriate perspective. You people are mentally ill. You use an invalid structure argument to get around the need for evidence.
You're literally insane.