>>25
Way to go! You got me! Oh, I can't defeat you! I'm no good! You will always win over me! Damn, guess I'll go and hide my head in shame behind my computer.
It's about time you faced the truth. Good job. Now do a barrel roll and let the adults talk about important things that you really won't understand until you grow up.
>>26
4tran, your entire industry is crippled, which is perhaps why you're in that much denial. Experimentation has lost precedence among physicists, and has produced successive generations of scientists who confuse math games with real results.
That's why I am so harsh about the "time travel" issue. Every assertion is based upon a MATH GAME, and not upon EVIDENCE. If you want to instead take a Godel-esque tack and say the EVIDENCE suggests that further evidence collection is impossible, then at least we can examine those claims and sense their truth. But until then, talking about time travel and the like has to be prefaced by a clear admission from the scientists that they just aren't working on evidentiary procedures.
For instance, if there's a claim of parallel universes, then an experiment MUST IMMEDIATELY FOLLOW to establish that is true or not. But as I've said, scientists today are embedded in a theory-only paradigm of forming conclusions, and asserting the need for experimental evidence just confuses them and leads to frustration.
We need to return to establishing knowledge from evidence. In the sciences, we need to return to using experiments to produce that evidence. People have become far too confused with what they see on computer screens being related to reality. We also need to re-run certain experiments now that we have access to off-Earth places. Will the Michaelson-Morley experiment reach the same conclusions in interplanetary space? Perhaps it won't, and we should CHECK.