Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

lol math competition

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-27 21:26

Okay, can't do these two.

Prove sum(k=1,n){arctan(1/(1+k+k^2))} = arctan(n/(n+2))

Show integral(0,infinity) e^{(x^2 + x^-2)/4} = sqrt(pi/e)

Name: 4tran 2008-03-27 21:38

I can't figure out which competition this is from, but this sounds unethical.

1st one sounds like some sort of induction proof.
2nd one sounds like you need to pull some sort of Gauss h4x with a 2D integral.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-27 23:52

2nd one sounds incorrect. x^2 + x^-2 > x^2 for all real non-zero x, and integral(0,infinity) e^(x^2/4) = +inf. Ergo integral(0,infinity) e^((x^2 + x^-2)/4) = +inf.

For the first, use arctan(a) + arctan(b) = arctan((a+b)/(1-ab)).

Name: CSharp !FFI4Mmahuk 2008-03-28 0:10

>>3
My 89 says that it's ∞, too. I'd normally trust Mathematica over my calculator, but Mathematica's being a dick tonight—it's spitting out some bullshit long answer, and refuses to simplify or even approximate it. And hell if I'm going to integrate this late at night.

So, are you sure it's √π/e?

Name: 4tran 2008-03-28 0:25

e^{(x^2 + x^-2)/4} -> e^{-(x^2 + x^-2)/4}
Mathematica yields right answer.

>>4
Does bullshit long answer involve erfs? lol

Name: CSharp !FFI4Mmahuk 2008-03-28 0:41

>>5
Yes. Yes, it does. And I'm too tired to dick around with it. :-/

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-28 8:43

>>6
Yeah, you can see the sqrt(pi/e) in the bullshit long expression mathematica spits out. I don't know whether it simplifies over the given bounds.

Name: Anonymous 2008-03-28 13:00

for the second

it equals e^-(1/2)* integral(0,inf) e^((x+x^-1)/2)^2

so need to show integral e^((x+x^-1)/2)^2=sqrt(pi)

Which is could very well be.

All I could be arsed to do,

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List