Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

ITT I ask libfags questions

Name: Niggertits 2008-01-18 9:43

1) Is it wrong to discriminate against certain groups, on the sole basis of skin colour (and not race), by cognitive ability? Please explain why your position position is backed by science. Refrain from answering unless you have a minimal understanding of statistics, please.

Moar questions to follow later, because I feel I'm going to have to deal with a lot of morons with this simple one.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 13:55

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence

Yes there is a difference in how the people of different skin colors score on IQ test.

Next time you want to troll do some of your own research.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 14:11

>>39
Thanks for your support, RedCream. Libfags, however, tend to shield themselves from any debate, especially when deep down they know that they're wrong about what they're preaching. It's nothing short of a mental disorder. Self-censorship, like ITT, is on the border between lulzworthy and plain sad. They can't even bring themselves to answer a single, simple question.
As for gun-grabbing, they'll NEVER be able to do it unless they amend your Constitution, no matter how hard they'll try. Thank your brilliant Founders for that.
Be more wary of Obama winning the election. You would experience the most incredible inflation in U.S. history under Obama. I, too, would like for the U.S. to stop warring in Iraq, but that war exists to uphold the petro-dollar which is why the US can spend so much. Obama would fail to uphold the petro-dollar AND keep spending, the worst possible outcome.
Either have a third Bush and STAY in Iraq, or have someone like Ron Paul who will massively cut spending in order to make the withdrawal possible. The problem is that 1) Ron Paul has no chance in hell, try 2012 ;_; and 2) Even he's doing it slightly wrong, but infinitely better than Obama. He advocates precipitous withdrawals, when in reality you need to back off slowly, facing each inflationary bump at a time. Pray for a warhawk president while you still can.
And no, libfags, this has nothing to do with his being (semi-)Black. This has to do with his being FAIL.
>>41
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_intelligence
But that's race and cognitive ability. I'm talking about skin colour and cognitive ability. Two different things.
Yes there is a difference in how the people of different skin colors score on IQ test.
Thank you.
Next time you want to troll do some of your own research.
LOL. I have done my own research. Do you actually believe I don't have a peer-reviewed paper ready proving just what I need?  Right now, I'm just enjoying seeing libfag true believers cringe and thinking of excuses to avoid answering my simple question.

You don't read like a libfag, btw. Are you a sane person?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 15:18

>>42
Present your hypothesis and evidence and then we could argue about it. If I do not know your hypothesis, then there is nothing to argue about.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 15:52

>>43
Why would I do that, when almost no one wants to answer a simple question? And related, do you know of any place where can I upload PDFs so that I can link them directly, after/if more libfags answer?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 17:52

>>44
Because your question does not have a hypothesis. I do not know what your hypothesis of the question is. Also, for PDFs, try rapidshit.

Name: Niggertits 2008-01-19 18:17

>>45
It's simple.
My hypothesis is that most libfags say that race amounts to skin colour (false) and then that skin colour cannot possibly be an indicator for intelligence (I'm asking here for libfags to restate this) due to their being lying scum. Then I asked the resident libfags exactly that, if I can link skin colour and intelligence... and sadly have received little straight answers. How it's done, I've already discussed: ecological correlation.

There is no hypothesis, which means a suggested explanation for a phenomenon. There needn't be. It's a question, for fuck's sake. And you have to answer it.

Rapidshit doesn't allow direct links, but I'll do it there if needed.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-19 18:45

I am in love with the first post RedCream made. It's completely wonderful. I love RedCream's comments so much I want to pull the topics and make a small collection of quotes and messages for my desk. I want to make a dedicated RedCream cabinet with his photo and everything.
I may be wrong, but I'm inclined to say this is the best text board user ever to use 4chan.
 
Fuck yeah, RedCream.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-20 3:13

Thank you 47 for ending this ridiculousness.

Name: Niggertits 2008-01-20 5:20

And thank you >>48 for giving me a reason to restart it! How about you answer the OP question.
By the way, RedCream, left a reply earlier.

Name: RedCream 2008-01-20 14:59

>>49
Wot?  What did you expect for a reply?

Name: Niggertits 2008-01-20 15:01

>>50
Well, nothing really. Just wanted to shamelessly bump the thread, actually.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-21 19:14

I'm not reading this entire stupid fucking argument, but I have one bit of wisdom to offer.

Discrimination is everywhere. The best example I can think of is in auto insurance. I am one of the best fucking drivers around, yet my insurance is more expensive than some one who is older than me. Why? Just because I'm a white, teenaged male. So it is okay to discriminate based on age and gender, but as soon as the color of your skin comes into play, it is racist. Changing your actions based on pneumonic devices is everywhere.

Let me give you another example. Say an 80 year old female walks in for an interview at Gamestop. What do you think the manager's first impression is going to be? I bet it will be this (She doesn't know games). And THERES ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH THINKING THAT BECAUSE 99.9% OF THE TIME IT IS TRUE.

We, as Americans, have become hyper-sensitive to discriminating based solely on color. The pure and simple reason is because Libfags hate the idea of one race being inferior to another. I am discriminated against all the time, and so is everyone else. It doesn't matter if one fucking individual is left out. You can say "Most blacks are fucking dipshits, but but 5% are smart so lets treat them exactly the same as everyone else." To which I will respond "What about me? Most white teenaged male drivers get into accidents, but the insurance companies have no problem discriminating against me, or the Gamestop manager has no problem discriminating against the 80 year old bitch." Statistically speaking, blacks are fucking stupid and should be purged.

tl;dr: Everyone is discriminated against, and Libfags give us shit for discriminating on color. Your minority black genius does not exempt blacks from being called stupid as a whole in the same way that your responsible teenaged driver does not exempt teenagers from getting a higher rate.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-21 19:34

Haha. America. You faggots actually care about political leaning.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-21 21:39

Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!
Fusk!

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List