Sure you can prove micro evolution

Now prove macro evolution, evolution from one species to another.  Are frogs the only thing you can use to say aquatic things moved on land?

Right, species change, but the entire evolutionary tree shows new kingdoms and classes branching off, such as mammals coming from reptiles, with "mammal-lie reptiles" as an example.  Why would a reptile develop mammary glands, softer skin, and fur while losing its thicker skin and reptilian features?  Why don't we have lizard people?  Given a few hundred million years, we should have a greater chance of more humanoids arising out of common animals, just as it is in the imagination of furries.  It's not an inevitability, but it is possible, given evolution, for these creatures to turn upright, toolbearing with opposable thumbs, and intelligent, but we haven't seen anything close to that yet, as animals are still dumb.  You would think more animals would develop their own culture and society, and with it language.  You would also expect new kingdoms and classes to eventually emerge, such as scaled or feathered mammals, or some other mutation to hint at an upcoming branch of something completely different, not just a species.  Why not let more of our own mutations breed, such as those that survive harlequin fetus syndrome into adulthood, creating a race of thick skinned humans, or that weird horn growth some people get, or more futanari people.  I want to see more successful mutations to create more crazy organisms that can rule in their own little environment and vow to conquer human life.