Which hypothesis is correct, leaving aside that the majority of academia chooses the first one for unknown reasons? The limited fossil record seem to match both.
Name:
Anonymous2007-12-17 0:22
>>7
Good thing you weren't claiming they were separate species, then. You were claiming there were no subgroups of Homo sapiens, which would be bullshit even if there weren't any subspecies.
And even a layperson with a very casual interest in human evolution should have heard of Homo sapiens idaltu, at least. You've just lost all credibility on the subject.