Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

There is no God, But There Are Kings

Name: Anonymous 2007-11-23 22:18

Ladies and gentlemen, there is a disturbing trend in atheism today of which stems from the shortsighted outlook of many atheists as to how to defeat “them”.  Every pro-atheist book, article, and discussion I have read boils down to proving to the zealots of religion how wrong they are.  This action is a waste of time and energy to the cause of atheism.  Instead of telling the ignorant masses that God is an illusion, we should be telling them how real Mankind is.

Religion was created to answer man’s then unanswered questions and to set down rules for a productive society.  Science has reached point that can answer any question one has about one’s past, present, and future.  We are now left with a series of archaic laws that have no basis in real life and cause nothing but oppression in society.  Those who continue to believe in a religion burden themselves with unnecessary restraints on their lifestyle.  Dogma orders people what to eat, what to wear, whom they should marry, whom they must hate.  But Atheism takes away such limiters on a person, providing an infinite amount of choices as how one lives his or her life as they see fit.

The question before all atheists is why do you continue to live, think, and argue like the religious person?  How about becoming better than them by taking the path that they cannot?  Atheists should not bother to argue with the religious man.  They cannot be swayed from their blind path as much as you cannot be swayed from yours. The effort you make arguing with others about the benefits of a God free society could be better spent into improving yourself as a leader they will gladly follow later in life.

If evolution has taught us anything, it the fact that survival goes to the strongest.  Thankfully, man’s knowledge of science and technology has removed his basic need for food, shelter, and clothing. In today’s modern society, we face a new kind of survival of the fittest. A man or woman must struggle against the others of the human race in order to fulfill their desires for a productive life. We, atheist and religious alike, fight for our right to have the most desirable mate, to have the grandest house, and to obtain more material wealth.  This is basic animal instinct.  But what about when your path to your desires is blocked by another who is physically and mentally your equal or greater?

The answer lies in taking advantage of the spiritual weakness of your opponent.

Ultimate moral authority does not bind atheism. A man who does not believe in God has more choices to his problems than a religious man.  If to get by in life an atheist has to lie to friend as to where he has been, he does so without regret.  If an atheist steals a loaf of bread to feed himself another day, then he will do it without hesitation.  If a desirable woman turns down an atheist to engage in sex, he will force himself on her and impregnate her.  If an atheist quarrels with another man over possessions and there is not a desirable settlement, the atheist will kill other man and take all of his possessions.

Does this seem repulsive?  That’s because religion has warped even the typical atheist’s way of thinking by inventing the abstract concepts “good” and “evil”.  Thou shall not kill, thou shall not covet thy neighbor’s wife, thou shall no bear false witness, etc…  These rules have been hammered into our heads since birth. But without God, these rules have no basis in the way the world really works. Organisms kill, get greedy, and deceive all the time in nature.  Why should man put a limit to those qualities that are beneficial for his survival?

So I ask again to all atheists out there, why are you thinking and living your life within the boundaries of a religious person?  Cheat, steal, and kill more to succeed in life.  A true atheist would stop in their climb for personal growth because there will be always one person better that you must overcome.  And yes, there are laws, created by the believers, which punish people who do “bad things” in life.  But the system punishes only those who get caught.  So, if one is committing an act that the religious society deems “wrong” don’t be caught doing it.

With a bit of planning and caution, there is nothing stopping an atheist from doing what he or she deems necessary to fulfill their desires.  The only moral authority they must answer to is themselves.  By doing so, an Atheist becomes a king among men and rules over others.  And thus shall the end of religion come, not by an argument, but by a command.

Name: Krieger 2007-11-29 16:43

>>31
First of all, calling something bullshit does nothing at all to disprove it. Second, allow me to quote the definition of adaptive straight from 'Webster's New College Dictionary: adaptive - capable of, suitable for, or tending toward adaptation. So, no, adaptive does not mean "something that gives the possessor of said trait an edge over individuals that don't possess it", nor is it even the noun you described it as. Third, I cannot stress enough how correct I am on the matter of species' survival. First,I'll note that "survival of the fittest" and 'natural selection' are the same thing. Now, let me quote directly from Wikipedia's page on natural selection. "Natural Selection is the process by which favorable traits that are heritable become more common in successive generations of a population of reproducing organisms, and unfavorable traits that are heritable become less common. Natural selection acts on the phenotype, or the observable characteristics of an organism, such that individuals with favorable phenotypes are more likely to survive and reproduce than those with less favorable phenotypes." This means that traits in a species which allow the species as a whole to grow in population become more popular among the species. Now, in my earlier reference, I compared religion to a trait of this sort in that it brings stability to a society through enforcement of principles which increase reproduction and cut down on the chaos. If you have any arguments against that statement, please provide citation to back it up, because a statement from someone mistaken for a troll isn't much evidence. So, here's a full list of what you need to do:

1. Cite evidence that no order is brought forth by religion, because it is most certainly not "obviously bullshit"

2. Stop using the word bullshit as evidence, it makes you look terrible.

3. Go to a local store and purchase one dictionary, so perhaps you'll not make yourself look like an idiot again.

4. Go to Google and search for natural selection; you obviously have no idea what it is.

5. Act like an adult so you won't be mistaken for a 10-year-old troll again.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List