>>5
Relevant to any given thing people invoke it for. I'm not the OP, so I don't know what he had in mind.
In the case of IQ specifically, I (being
>>2 and
>>4) personally don't have a problem with accepting that if certain ethnic groups can be more prone to certain cancers (for example), they can also have a higher or lower IQ on average, but to invoke race as the
only factor is stupid.
There are plenty of scientists who realise this without necessarily having fallen victim to Gould's straw men, but there also plenty of dumbfuck run-of-the-mill racists who don't.