Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Atheism versus Theism

Name: Krieger 2007-11-14 16:33

Alright, I want a good, clean fight.  Simply state your side, your argument/counter-argument/comment and whatnot.  I'm not trying to troll this, just wanting a good debate, so let's have one. (Atheist by the way)

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-03 5:00

atheism doesn't distinguish from religion in any appreciable manner.  'god' becomes the universe, 'religious rules' become scientific laws.  i mean if we're happy with that, kudos to us, but we're not really differentiating from religion.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-03 8:33

>>121
That's adorable. It'd be less frightening if people didn't actually believe it.
The keyword is "evidence". Science has it. Religion does not.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-03 20:49

thank you >>7
you have helped me dearly
i hope your reading this

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-03 20:53

>>121

do we pray to the universe? did the universe impart upon us a book of moral guidelines for how we should live our life? has anyone ever killed another person because that person didn't believe in the same universe as they did?

if the answer to any of those questions in 'yes' then please seek psychological help. if not then please come back with a less ridiculous notion.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-03 22:58

>>122

>>91 here.  evidence suggests, but there is no such thing as proof in an open system (i.e. the universe).  >>121 is smoking something, but your comeback is actually stupid.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-03 23:12

you guys are all giving yourselves way too much credit.  for the most part, people believe (or don't believe) in God (or the Easter bunny) because of nonrational reasons.  we're in almost no position to actually evaluate the truth claims of most religious or atheistic arguments conclusively.  so, we just end up choosing something convenient depending on our society, temperament, and desires.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-04 1:35

>>125
Please figure out the difference between proof and evidence, cocknugget.

>>126
for the most part, people believe (or don't believe) in God (or the Easter bunny) because of nonrational reasons.
And when they realise that and shut the fuck up about it, instead of trying to claim they have anything to back up their beliefs, we can put this entire argument to rest.

we're in almost no position to actually evaluate the truth claims of most religious or atheistic arguments conclusively.
You too. Difference between evidence and proof.
We aren't in a position to evaluate any truth claim conclusively. That doesn't mean random shots in the dark get as much credence as actual science.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-04 1:47

There's a cat on the table.
God can't possibly exist.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-04 2:17

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-04 11:39

hte cake is a life
THREAD OVER

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-04 14:02

Atheism:
The atheistic conclusion is that the arguments indicate there is insufficient reason to believe that any gods exist.

Insufficient reason to believe that any gods exist.

Insufficient reason.

Insufficient.

Atheism wins.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-04 14:03

Atheism
The atheistic conclusion is that the arguments indicate there is insufficient reason to believe that any gods exist.

Insufficient reason to believe that any gods exist.

Insufficient reason

Atheism wins.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-04 17:58

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-04 18:27

ATHEISM LOSES BECAUSE THE BIBLE SAYS SO. HAHA FAGOTS.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-06 6:00

GOD DOES NOT EXIST. PROOF? FRONT PAGE.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-06 12:46

>>135
you're right :(

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-06 13:53

>>135
I've never found the problem of evil to be all that convincing.
It works against the Abrahamic religions, but not against theism in general.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-06 19:27

Even if there was a God, Christians are still stupid, mindless idiots who probably pissed him off more than Atheists.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List