Name: ~ 2007-10-25 13:58
http://www.fruechtetheory.com/
http://www.fruechtetheory.com/full.html
"Abstract
The following analysis investigates the possibility of there being an exchange of electron rotational kinetic energy between atoms and molecules, and how it may relate to the gravitational force. A conventional, measured value of the gravitational constant is used to find the wavelength of a graviton which is determined to be 3.97 x 10-15 m, on the order of twice the diameter of the electron. The calculation reduces to 4hf/3 = G, units added in the body of the paper, where Planck’s constant, h, is a known physical value, and the frequency, f, is determined from the wavelength of the photon. Certain astronomical data is presented as being supportive of the theory; and a neutron test is suggested that has the possibility of verifying the proposed lack of gravitational effect on those particles when isolated from other nucleons. Additionally, since the resultant energy of the graviton using a conventional value of G is within 0.5 MeV of one third the mass equivalent energy of the proton, the formula is used to propose a value of G that brings these energies together."
Show the full paper to your physics professors, etc.
It would be truly baffling if this theory were NOT correct. The question of 'what causes gravity', finally answered.
"Questions that may be answered by this theory include why the particles in the solar wind are not pulled back toward the Sun by its gravity within the first few thousand miles, but rather travel on through the solar system, and why the Van Allen belts do not warp, keeping their shape in the magnetic bottles formed by the Earth’s magnetic field lines.
Other things that can be explained better are neutron stars, and maybe even black holes. By rough calculation an electron in an atomic orbital can give off only 61 gravitons before it collapses into the nucleus of the atom if no gravitons are absorbed by the electron in that time. In areas where the gravitational field is not strong enough, hydrogen atoms in stars will indeed gradually collapse in sequence, and if the resulting neutrons have their magnetic dipole moments aligned in a lattice such as to stabilize the resulting energy, and not decay in just over 15 minutes, a neutron star may result.
Unfortunately, there are also established outcomes of theoretical physics that may no longer be needed, those presumably being the concepts of the quark, the positron, general relativity, dark energy, and string theory."
Quarks, positrons, general relativity, dark energy, and string theories in the garbage. It’s like the discovery of double helix DNA structure - so relatively simple, yet practical, inciting thoughts of ‘why didn’t we think of that’, and providing simple answers to questions once imagined complex.
http://www.fruechtetheory.com/full.html
"Abstract
The following analysis investigates the possibility of there being an exchange of electron rotational kinetic energy between atoms and molecules, and how it may relate to the gravitational force. A conventional, measured value of the gravitational constant is used to find the wavelength of a graviton which is determined to be 3.97 x 10-15 m, on the order of twice the diameter of the electron. The calculation reduces to 4hf/3 = G, units added in the body of the paper, where Planck’s constant, h, is a known physical value, and the frequency, f, is determined from the wavelength of the photon. Certain astronomical data is presented as being supportive of the theory; and a neutron test is suggested that has the possibility of verifying the proposed lack of gravitational effect on those particles when isolated from other nucleons. Additionally, since the resultant energy of the graviton using a conventional value of G is within 0.5 MeV of one third the mass equivalent energy of the proton, the formula is used to propose a value of G that brings these energies together."
Show the full paper to your physics professors, etc.
It would be truly baffling if this theory were NOT correct. The question of 'what causes gravity', finally answered.
"Questions that may be answered by this theory include why the particles in the solar wind are not pulled back toward the Sun by its gravity within the first few thousand miles, but rather travel on through the solar system, and why the Van Allen belts do not warp, keeping their shape in the magnetic bottles formed by the Earth’s magnetic field lines.
Other things that can be explained better are neutron stars, and maybe even black holes. By rough calculation an electron in an atomic orbital can give off only 61 gravitons before it collapses into the nucleus of the atom if no gravitons are absorbed by the electron in that time. In areas where the gravitational field is not strong enough, hydrogen atoms in stars will indeed gradually collapse in sequence, and if the resulting neutrons have their magnetic dipole moments aligned in a lattice such as to stabilize the resulting energy, and not decay in just over 15 minutes, a neutron star may result.
Unfortunately, there are also established outcomes of theoretical physics that may no longer be needed, those presumably being the concepts of the quark, the positron, general relativity, dark energy, and string theory."
Quarks, positrons, general relativity, dark energy, and string theories in the garbage. It’s like the discovery of double helix DNA structure - so relatively simple, yet practical, inciting thoughts of ‘why didn’t we think of that’, and providing simple answers to questions once imagined complex.