>>9
"Due to innate untestability, these games CAN'T apply to reality."
actually, you could develope a theory that was an exact discription of reality, and an inability to test it wouldn't affect whether or not it was how reality actually worked. stop your fail logic.
separately, you all still fail at recognizing the difference between a model that produces useful predictions and an attempt at an accurate explanation of what the universe really is.
if they could produce a model that required the assumption that giant elephants are compacted into the space between every atom's nucleus and electrons, but it produced good, useful predictions, that would be a good theory, regardless of your stance on elephantatomism.