science is completely wrong
1
Name:
Anonymous
2007-08-27 10:36
ID:GNNpFuef
no basis for induction in human observation
2
Name:
Anonymous
2007-08-27 11:05
ID:PMfbl4l1
no thats where philosophy comes in
3
Name:
Anonymous
2007-08-27 12:19
ID:paRW0jFY
tubula rasa, liebniz, a + a = 2a
4
Name:
RedCream 2007-08-27 14:39
ID:WCgDrdF8
>>1
Prayer = no result
Science = results
PWNED!
5
Name:
Anonymous
2007-08-27 15:43
ID:Ur9SYFyM
>>4
OP is playing a nihilistic logic game.
He didn't say anything about religion, faggot.
6
Name:
Anonymous
2007-08-27 17:39
ID:PMfbl4l1
>>5
No, you clearly don't understand the RedCream dynamic. He attacks religion at every possible turn because it's one of those subjects that nobody else cares about, but he argues about it like an autistic child.
7
Name:
Anonymous
2007-08-27 18:35
ID:GNNpFuef
>>5
accurate
>>6
also accurate
8
Name:
Anonymous
2007-08-27 19:21
ID:lEoYulNM
I am god and i designed everything.
9
Name:
Anonymous
2007-08-27 19:47
ID:1P9ESuvB
>>8
Except the English language
10
Name:
Anonymous
2007-08-27 21:28
ID:6hRwpmYa
>>4 he didn't even mention religion you zealous fucking idiot.
11
Name:
Anonymous
2007-08-30 11:21
ID:CBMvSQNk
12
Name:
Anonymous
2007-08-30 11:30
ID:GkjWknVb
iam god and I made everything you know
13
Name:
Anonymous
2007-08-30 16:07
ID:DDKII2am
>>8,12
But then you also designed/made yourself. Oops, time paradox!
14
Name:
RedCream
2007-08-30 17:11
ID:TAo5+z6z
bust a move, religion!
15
Name:
Anonymous
2007-08-30 17:19
ID:7XDu/Dc6
>>13
Wrong, no time paradox.
I can switch my body!
16
Name:
Anonymous
2007-09-01 8:56
ID:HZGEsjfL
>>5
>>10
No, but who else besides freaky-deaky religious kooks would want to "crush" science? It's what they always seem to want to do, because they consider it a threat to their flimsy superstitions.
17
Name:
Anonymous
2007-09-01 13:41
ID:4dgaLNAb
>>16
OP here. Atheist mathematician.
18
Name:
Anonymous
2007-09-01 14:17
ID:HZGEsjfL
AHh, I don''t evne know what you meant by what you said in first post. I'm funking druck right nnow.
Newer Posts