>>5
There being no difference between one and the other, Occam's Razor says you're being an idiot and that there really isn't a Gilgamesh. The more you have to contrive special circumstances to arrive at an answer, the more you've just constructed an EXCUSE to avoid the real answer.
At any rate, please cite evidence for ANY of the individual properties you noted: invisible, heatless, formless, "outside of time", etc. Isn't it curious that you have to ascribe many NEW and heretofore unseen properties to this entity to explain its lack of presence? Again, with too many lame excuses laid out to explain something (which isn't even event-driven, either!), eventually your rational mind has to admit you're being a fool and are only avoiding the most apparent answer. If your rational mind can't make that admission, then those of us with rational minds will just isolate you from sane debates since you will be definably INSANE.
So, we're back to the hard nugget of the problem: 100s of millions of people believe in the fucking Easter Bunny, but in a much worse way since we know that at least bunnies exist ... and that's NOT SO with divinity. There's a 100% lack of any evidence whatsoever for divinity. There's just no evidence ... AND THERE SHOULD BE A LOT OF IT.