>>38
>"wouldn't you call creating everything in the universe an interference?"
I said interference "after the initialization."
>"Is there some law that states that the laws of physics can never change? I think not."
If the laws changed they wouldn't be laws.
>"The only thing that makes us think they cannot change is that we have not observed them changing."
Either that or it hasn't changed anything. Scientific determination says there is only one possible future. If any small thing is manipulated in the universe, the rest of the universe would have to be manipulated to accommodate it, and even the smallest manipulation would have unimaginable impacts (chaos theory). Basically, it would be impossible to manipulate a little without manipulating a lot, which humans would notice.